I said how it looks so good-looking, but I didn't understand it?
I said, why do I feel that the content is empty, and I feel a little confused and don't know what to say?
The film that also shows the love in the American Civil War period, I feel that "Gone with the Wind" is better.
The same film is 2 and a half hours long, and it is also a love under the precarious situation. . Huh, the last time I felt this way was when I was watching
. . After checking, the two films are the work of the same director!
When looking at British patients, I don't understand why the scores are so high.
After watching Cold Mountain, I figured it out - maybe it's because the bigger the cast, the more attention it can attract. A film can get 70,000 reviews. Even if half of the people give negative reviews, it's still better than those Small-cost and small-production small-cast films have a higher favorable rate.
Not to mention the favorable rate, maybe the total number of viewers of the latter is less than a fraction of that of the former, and some moderate and negative reviews are removed, thus creating the illusion that "the former is good-looking and the latter is average".
What's more, films with big-name movie stars are always better and easier to get public praise than those films with only small actors.
Because many people are, all just, give high marks to the big name, regardless of the quality of the movie played by the big name.
View more about Cold Mountain reviews
