Unlike, there is no sense of substitution

Donnell 2021-12-18 08:01:11

Kutcher himself is like a god at best. He turned around and took a look. It seemed like it, but in fact it was much different from Jobs. It may be a problem of height. Even when Jobs was very thin, his body did not appear so tall, and Jobs was in the late 90s. She started to lose her hair, and her hair was even less since 2000. Woz is not like it. Now watching Woz, he is also a savvy fat man, which is like a movie. Woz speaks very fast, faster than Jobs. The only thing that surprised me was Jef Raskin, very similar. Ive has a similar British accent, but Ive has a bald head and fucks. There was a bit of torture in the process of watching the movie, that is, there was no sense of substitution. The movie was divided into three or four times before I finished it.
A large part of Jobs's own charm lies in his speech, his mouth is good, clear and smooth. Obviously, Kutcher does not have this ability. I don't think that Kutcher's basic skills as a Hollywood actor has reached the standard of a good actor. Jobs is the one who speaks best, speaks English best, and expresses best among all CEOs who are willing to speak in person. After seeing Jobs' own speeches, I feel that Jobs is more like a qualified Hollywood actor. Maybe Jobs treats every speech as a performance. In other words, Jobs is actually a well-known actor. You ask a little boy to act as a senior actor who has been in trouble for decades. It is impossible in itself. The acting skills, eyesight, and line skills are far behind. .
Regarding the plot, there is nothing to innovate. Many people know about Jobs' story, and there is a ready-made biography. Jobs' own story is a good movie, leaving few opportunities for screenwriters. The movie is basically based on the content of Jobs’ speech in Stanford. The only one is Lisa, but the explanation of Lisa in the movie is very strange. I was afraid of offending some people who didn't like this topic.
There is another plot. I thought there would be a movie. Jobs visited Palo Alto and saw the shocking expressions and reactions when he saw the graphical interface. They didn't appear in the movie. What a great material this is, what a pity.
After watching the movie, I was a little bit injured, and Jobs was so ruined by the movie. I quickly took out Jobs' original speech to soothe my injured heart, and it feels much more comfortable. Suddenly I remembered a story told by an English composition review teacher. Every time I finished reviewing the composition, after reading so many bad compositions, I felt that my English level dropped rapidly. I needed to read the original English news immediately to make up for it.
Looking at the photos of Jobs when he was young, it was actually more like Robert De Niro. In addition, Woz is more like when John Travolta was fat.

View more about Jobs reviews

Extended Reading

Jobs quotes

  • Steve Jobs: [pointing the chips on the Apple I board] It's got to be straight, and those more symmetric.

  • Paul Terrell: All right, Steve. I'll try to sell. But if I don't, I'm not making another order.

    Steve Jobs: Okay, that's fine... But I think you might be really interested in our second model.

    Paul Terrell: What's the second model?

    Steve Wozniak: What are you talking about?

    Steve Jobs: [in an undertone] All-in-one.