Wikipedia tells me:
"Liberty is a concept in *political* philosophy under which human beings can govern themselves, act by free will, and be responsible for their actions. There are academically different views on the concept of freedom. There are differences in the understanding of the relationship between individuals and society. Freedom includes freedom of speech and information and freedom of the press stipulated in the constitutions of various countries. Of course, there are many free wills such as freedom of thought, freedom of religious belief, etc., but due to academic There are many different concepts of freedom, and there is only a thin line between freedom and wrongdoing. Therefore, in the legal concept, the principle of freedom of innocence is used to protect people's right to freedom. Freedom is also reflected in democratic politics as a spirit, and freedom is the right to freedom. What is right is not so certain of the spirit.
And freedom (English: freedom) has many meanings:
1. Means a right or liberty guaranteed by the constitution or fundamental law, which ensures that people are protected from a certain *special* Slavery, imprisonment or control of *political *power*, or to ensure the liberation of the people.
2. Freedom in the sense of willful. Say what you want to say, do what you want. Laissez-faire.
3. Do things according to the rules Freedom in the sense, the so-called recognition and transformation of necessity. 4. Freedom in the sense of autonomy
(English: autonomous). Kant uses the word freedom in this sense. In
the
Declaration of Human Rights, the programmatic document of the French Revolution, freedom is defined as:
“Liberty is the right to do everything that is harmless to others. ”—Article 4 (excerpt) of the Declaration of Human Rights, the programmatic document of the French Revolution, in 1789,
absolute freedom may exist in theory, but since society is composed of people, freedom is not only an individual issue, but a The degree to which each subject in a society defines each other, so Thomas Jefferson believed that the freedom of the individual is subject to the equal freedom of others. Further, some people think that [who?] freedom is related to responsibility, and related freedom should be related to related responsibility. The boundaries of liberty are human rights, and liberty ends with human rights.”
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
It can be seen that we often regard freedom as a definition 2 freedom in the sense of freedom. Say whatever you want, do whatever you want. Laissez-faire.
But it ignores the fine print of "anything that does no harm to others" in other definitions. - We often ignore the human rights of others because of our own freedom.
The play was originally intended to make us think about the meaning of freedom itself (not morality, human nature), but it was interpreted in a distorted sense of freedom.
Everything that happens in the "Plan" seems to be everyone exercising their rights, but only enslaved!
ps The "plan" itself violates not only the US constitution, but also the Chinese constitution! So, enough of you who say you want to implement the plan!
View more about The Purge: Anarchy reviews
