When the movie "Sex and the City" was released last year, the American version of "GQ" magazine listed "60 reasons why men don't watch "Sex and the City"", roughly as follows: A movie that only focuses on sex, marriage and shoes is too shallow; It is crazy to think that shopping women who can do what they want is free. The female wedding couples and their Ze puppet standards are too stressful. Older women, no matter how they dress, are not as attractive as young juicy bodies... …, the most core reason is the classification of "Sex and the City"-CHICK-LIT. "Iron Man", which was released at the same time, attracted ridicule. This category of movies only appreciates fighting, muscles, machinery, aimless killing, and cunning perseverance. Doesn't it go deep? They have simple plots and single classifications. They are often lone heroes who defeat evil forces, or science and technology have saved the galaxy. No matter how murders go together, young girls are lying naked in a pool of blood... They are designed for long bodies and staggering heads. The young man prepares. Corresponding to the little chicken literature, there is also a general term-LAD-LIT.
Maybe because of the hilarious night, I think the latest dumb donkey movie "Wolverine" is pretty good-looking. It is brisk and sleek. It is a perfect Hollywood assembly line product. There is no suspenseful ending. It is not surprising that brothers turn against each other, lover betrays, companions turn against each other, and the boss is a big conspirator. It even metaphors a certain rule that conforms to the samurai style. If you know how to be invisible, you have flowers in your hands, and your wonderful skills are not worth the sense of power. The power is not fat on the body, but steel in the bones. No matter how bad it is, Hugh Jackman, or James, who he plays, is also called Logan and Wolverine. He is a superb mature handsome man. The camera stays on his chest for a long time. It is shallow, and it is also sexy and shallow. The lads around me were not irritated by the sexiness of others. They yelled that women are the target of desire projection and the visual rules of being watched are being reversed. Both men and women are willing to stare at the sturdy, hairy chest, and then There will also be "Star Trek", "Iron Man 2", "Terminator: The Salvation Army"..., the flashy dumb donkey movie season is coming.
Just like the unconfident chicken literature always looks for a bit of deep ancestors, Jane Austen, the Bronte sisters, Virginia Woolf, the dumb donkey movie also has some grandpas with the same burly body and mind: Jack London, Hemingway and Norman Mailer can follow the three elements of high-quality novels given by Austin: wisdom, genius, and taste. Chicken literature and dumb donkey movies do not have them. They are criticized for this and are therefore simple and cute. Stupid Donkey Movies cast aside the time-honored thoughts, without the depression and banality of middle-aged temperament, only satisfy the most superficial visual appeal, only provide the most mindless 2-hour escape, and only comfort those who desire abstraction and danger. Danger can relieve worries and stimulate emotions. It is a color. Mixing it with other colors can make those colors more vivid. The thought that the hero on the screen is about to die in the next moment makes the feeling incalculable. The tree is green, not the ordinary green, but the green before the hurricane, the sky is blue, and the blue is about to step down. The image of dying in the 20s and hopeless love merge together to become a kind of strong , The joy of precariousness... Having
said so many good things about stupid donkey movies, I only hope that when the chicken literature season comes, you can willingly and seriously accompany your girlfriend to take a look.
View more about X-Men Origins: Wolverine reviews
