The movie is very good, and I like the subject matter very much. The only regret is that I really shouldn't take my parents to watch this kind of movie together. . too serious
The first article of the short review basically elevates the theme. If you think that this film is a film with private goods and the director instilling a concept of interpretation to the public, then he will not be able to get on the stage. The director's techniques that are concerned are not necessarily so instructive, and even suspect the director's incitement and the forces behind him, so conspiracy theories emerge one after another; It is a kind of courage to pursue the truth, then he can sing and cry, and he is heartbroken.
For a person who is far away from that period of history and has never known, this film basically fulfills the obligation of popular science, who is Kennedy, what is his political stance, and where are the doubts in the case itself, but I also feel some deficiencies, that is The image of Kennedy is too brilliant. He is anti-war, he is full of humanistic care, and his death is set off by various advantages. Conspiracy theory, but in fact, you have seen so many US presidents, you can say who is more capable and who is The diplomacy is brilliant, but there is really no one who is more "noble". Everyone is the same scum, but their abilities and starting points are different, so the director's feeling of smuggling private goods is still stronger.
The tracking of the mystery itself later tells a very good story. In particular, the half-hour monologue of the protagonist in the courtroom at the end is really intriguing. It is a classic worthy of praise in film history. In contrast, the lengthy wait of the first two and a half hours seems to be worth it.
After watching it, I was planted grass and danced with wolves, but after watching it for half an hour, I found that the rhythm was slower. .
View more about JFK reviews