I saw the logic of Douyou criticizing the movie: about Marianne, as a professional spy, actually sending out intelligence because of being threatened. I think this is because the people who criticize logic have not fully understood the character of the heroine. I want to mention a few details that appeared in the movie: 1. In the assassination of the ambassador, when Marianne shot her friend's husband, the friend and her looked at each other for a second. 2. After the mission was completed, the escape was too smooth. 3. Very purposeful. Applauding for love with the male lead 4 Checking the pinhole of the male lead donating blood 5 Hesitation in front of the jewelry store 6 The female lead told the male lead when she gave birth 7 The intelligence of the indigo plan, only the female lead knew that her German Colleagues don't know, so if the hostess doesn't mention it, the nanny and jewelry store owner won't know at all
Above all, the heroine is not passing information because of being threatened, or at least not because of Anna. As for why the male protagonist believes that she is passing information because of being threatened, it is more out of instinctual protection and self-hypnosis for his wife and children. Anna is a person with a strong desire to survive, and she will try even if there is even a little hope of living, so she will betray the nanny and jewelry store owner to try Max's extremely unreliable plan. Marianne is also a spy who relies on her true feelings to bless her acting skills. For her, her daughter is not only the crystallization of their love, but also a weight to gain Max's trust. So, when Max's plan failed, she was also willing to kill herself for her daughter. There is actually no problem in logic, but it made me have the urge to brush twice.
View more about Allied reviews
