The director's creativity and imagination are highly affirmed. Compared with Crazy Zoo's intuitive fairy tale sense that can be viewed by all groups, the harmony combined with the post-meaning interpretation and the family-friendly finale Canis Island It seems a bit divided, but this political fable is also more thrilling, cruel and realistic. If you watch it purely from the perspective of a superficial fairy tale, it is fine. The reason why you feel a little divided when you brush it is because there are some logical bugs in the perspective of the superficial story. For example, why did the boy insist on taking the slide and force the leader to go. Picking up sticks, and someone who loves dogs at the end suggested that people who don’t love dogs should be put to death. Why was Diandian locked in the ground of the shrine? One of Diandian’s children was adopted by the male protagonist. The mayor was easily persuaded to flash back to the interspersed picture , why there is such a weird ancient law of family blood inheritance in the modern campaign system, and so on. But it is these logical bugs that only superficially appear to be logical bugs, which I call split points, that trigger the interpretive desire of some moviegoers. Weiss uses these split points to blur the boundary between story and interpretation, and make it scatter multiple interpretation directions. This is a deliberate narrative fragmentation. It can also be said that the part of the story and interpretation shows the dislocation of viewing. feel.
View more about Isle of Dogs reviews
