In my case, there is a very simple criterion for whether the movie is good or not, that is, if I can watch the movie, can I stare at the list to empty my mind without being bored, until the progress bar is nearing the end, and suddenly start expecting that it is impossible to exist. easter eggs. After all, the 2-3 hours of feature content is always just a glimpse of this parallel world, how can it be enough to watch? In that time and space that I can't visit in person, there are still all kinds of possibilities, details, and settings. How can I satisfy my boundless curiosity just through this window?
I believe that there should be a lot of people evaluating the narrative logic and shooting techniques of the film, and in addition to the story itself, I would like to ask about the social issues reflected in the details, or American issues. Social media, live broadcast, technology replacement, privacy, Weed, Bad Cops, single-parent family, doting, responsibility, human nature... The director is beyond the main line, and he can control each of these sub-lines just right, it has to be surprising Cow batch.
In the end, the thing that struck me the most about the whole movie was the ending. To be precise, the two endings, big and small, made me stunned. As an employee of a technology company, the father can use what he has learned to the extreme, and successfully reverse the direction of development of things. The logic is self-consistent and the atmosphere is full, which can not be said to drag the suspense to the last minute. As for the small ending of deliberately cropping the screen in the lower right corner after the curtain falls, it is undoubtedly the finishing touch. It's no wonder that the film took only 6 months to shoot, but it took two years to edit. It can be said that in order to polish everything to no less, the director and screenwriter really made a big wish.
View more about Searching reviews