civil rights epic

Grant 2022-03-25 09:01:08

Alan Sorkin's long-awaited historical legal film recreates the pre-convicted and manipulated trial after the anti-Vietnam War movement in 1968. The filming is very neat, the court debate and the past flashbacks are cross-narrated, the lines are still as sharp and sonorous as always, but unfortunately the audio-visual language is still relatively rigid, the group portraits are focused, and some characters are not portrayed as flesh and blood, but the performances of several old actors Convincing (Cohen, Rylance, Michael Keaton, and Frank Langella as the judge). Launched at this time, it is quite intentional to use the past to satirize the present, hoping to turn the tide at a critical moment. (8.0/10)

Dominic 2022-03-26 09:01:05

Like a political essay, arguing about whether it is on the surface or not, without the slightest attempt to penetrate the hearts of the characters, everyone is an empty speech machine that can't stop. This is not a movie, it is clearly a spit meeting that is not funny at all.