I would like to express my condolences to Julie's hard work and the skinny professionalism of the actors. Most of the criticisms and criticisms on the Internet are mostly based on the large-scale imitation of the film's structural design. Personally, I think the first half of the film can be praised more than criticized. After all, young actors are good at acting. Lost encouragement, you can use Hollywood-style routines, and she can use them too, so they won't be too black. But what I am most dissatisfied with is that in the second half of the concentration camp, most of the space is used to deliberately express the communication and competition between Big Bird and Louis. Silk is ambiguous, but obviously the layout is smaller, not as big and profound as the latter. It is a bit vulgar and suspected of selling corruption. In several contests, only Louis' stubbornness can be seen. It is a bit far-fetched to say that it is indestructible, and this The focus of body-to-individual performance makes it easy to overlook the suffering of the POW community. In the end, I didn't understand what kind of mental state the prisoner of war and the guard were in. It was ambiguous, and it ended up being an anticlimactic result.
View more about Unbroken reviews
