The praise exploded??? The whole movie maintained a very high level of two hours and 30 minutes. The truth of the matter moved forward cunningly during the "overthrow and overthrow" process of the defense lawyer and the male protagonist, and the whole reasoning was staged brilliantly under the deliberate inducement and strong attitude of the "lawyer". In the first half of the story, the audience should be able to easily guess that there is something wrong with the defense lawyer, but I didn't guess that it was played by the mother of the deceased. Compared with the weak, gloomy and morbid state of the victim's family, her contrast can be classified as typical "Women are weak, and mothers are strong." At the same time, the efforts made by my father for this are also very sad. A few high-energy points I think: the perspective of storytelling has changed from a bad girl to a bad boy, and the fact that the victim may survive (in fact, it is not necessary for the male protagonist to get rid of it completely, just because he has 100% trust in the "lawyer" at this moment and He was confident that he could get out of the crime, and even had a hint of pride. The "lawyer" was very unforgettable when he heard the shock and anger, but couldn't wear a gang.) The "lawyer" returned to the opposite building to face the male protagonist's room divider to remove makeup, The filming is very good. All the emotions of both sides are thrown into the background music that is pressing step by step. At the end, when facing the real lawyer, the male protagonist smiles speechlessly, which is very eye-catching. So don't trust a man with a track record of cheating on anything because they practice concealment, adapt to concealment, and rely on concealment. Once a major incident occurs, the first solution that comes to mind is concealment.
But I think the direction of the whole lawsuit is still unclear. First of all, I think it is very uncertain whether a fake lawyer's identity "induces" the audio-visual materials spoken by the male protagonist with a strong purpose without the defendant's knowledge of the recording. Secondly, one of the only two parties in this case, the heroine, has died, and the only witness has been bribed. Except for the favorable clue of the location of the corpse, everything else can be overturned by the logic of the hero. And if there are items left by the female protagonist in the car (and this shot was indeed given, so the male protagonist is very smart and cunning, and he planned the possibility of framing the female protagonist when he drowned) It is difficult to convict the male protagonist of a felony, that is, as said in the film, at most he will not report the information and help the female protagonist to conceal it. To sum up, I hope that the heroine will leave some solid evidence to the old couple, except for the part about the confession on the phone. (The film does not mention it too much here, it is to leave a little thought for the audience)
Finally, the so-called "the invisible guest" I think refers to the "mysterious witness". A key character who opens the mouth of the male protagonist but does not actually exist. This setting is a miracle. (Of course, there is also the obvious "murderer" of the secret room murder, which has also been confirmed to not exist, and the murderer is the male protagonist himself).
View more about The Invisible Guest reviews
