but he has been breaking through the character in the process.
If he does not want to be found cheating and can kill,
why would he kill his mistress and forge a secret room in a well-known place? Isn't this telling the world that he is cheating?
And the car accident can be said to be forced into it. If you don't create a secret room and sprinkle money in the bathroom, you don't need to substitute for a car accident
. All he does is to make his crime more complicated, which is the opposite of the razor principle.
If it is a real crime, the male protagonist will choose to create a fictional murderer in order to The scene where the two of them negligently killed the male mistress by asking for money to extort the two of them for cheating.
But the layout of the scene is not to give people two impressions, one, the secret room makes the male protagonist the only prisoner; or two, even if there are prisoners, it is for vendetta against them, thus creating a secret room scene.
And this must explain the reason of vendetta
forcibly substituted into the car accident. As a result, the two crimes that the male protagonist tried to cover up have since been exposed by the male protagonist himself. One is cheating, and the other is killing Daniel. That is to say, the male protagonist forced himself to confess two crimes that
he did not want to admit without any reason.
If all these things revealed that
he had no need to kill his mistress at all.
That is to say, the male protagonist of the movie not only made public the two crimes he tried to cover up, but also killed his mistress.
It can be said that far-fetched, logical explosion. It is not an exaggeration to say that it is for the sake of the brain.
View more about The Invisible Guest reviews
