It's just that they have been impossible since the male protagonist killed the first person, and everything is doomed to be a tragedy.
But even if they don't kill people, it's impossible for them. Sooner or later, such a woman will derail. The so-called sense of security is just an excuse for indulgence.
The male protagonist has limited ability, and the most tragic thing is to fall in love with this kind of woman. Killing can't change anything, but not killing can't change anything. How many times of derailment must be endured and how much emotional effort will it take to influence this kind of woman? For me it was unbearable once.
So the best way is to stay away from this kind of woman.
There should be a second season to watch the ending, but it's a pity that Baker died, she is much more beautiful than Candice.
Love really exists only in works of art.
As for the present world, it's all about mutual seduction and involuntary infatuation, just lust.
If it can be stabilized by bondage, it is not true, it is false. Humans love to shape falsehoods and to pierce falsehoods. Marriage is shaped by people. When the existing system cannot support people's desires and 100% exists in name only, does marriage still exist?
I feel that the development of society is the process of human beings acknowledging their own nature, becoming more and more liberating, and becoming more and more tolerant of human behavior. As long as survival is not endangered, I dare to say that there is nothing that is not allowed in the future, only The relationship between the two must have been thrown into some corner by then.
The future is an era of unbridled promiscuity.
It's exciting, but I don't like it.
If you don't like it either, before society has developed to that stage, find someone who is dedicated to love.
View more about You reviews
