View more about Steve Jobs reviews
A successful paranoid is revered as a genius, and a failure is called a fool
Nola 2022-04-23 07:01:57
Because of the good impression of "The Social Network" before, I also had expectations for "Steve Jobs", which was also written by Sorkin. Maybe Zhuyu was in front. After watching it, I felt that the same director, Danny Bo. Earl and David Fincher still have some gaps. In the first story in 1984, Jobs' ex-girlfriend asked Jobs that Apple had a market value of $440 million, and he and his daughter had to live on relief. When Jobs felt, Jobs replied: I think Apple's stock price is undervalued , now available for purchase. You can see that the director went to great lengths to make Jobs a complete asshole. Sorkin's dialogue skills are indeed unmatched, but this is also a double-edged sword. The characters in the film are all like the best debaters in the debate. The endless dialogues and sparring disputes are exciting at first glance. It turned into a painful viewing experience, because it was constantly intertwined with flashbacks of reality and the past. In fact, about Jobs, I am most interested in his relationship with Joan Baez and his experience in Pixar. Unfortunately, it is not reflected in the movie, which is a pity. It is worth mentioning that the performances of Michael Fassbender and Kate Winslet in the movie are quite good, and it is very hopeful that they will win a golden statue each tomorrow. In addition, I saw Apple's first commercial "1984" for the first time in the movie. I felt very amazing. I found it on the Internet to appreciate it, and found that it turned out to be the work of the great director Ridley Scott. After watching the movie, I still have the biggest feeling: the successful paranoid is regarded as a genius, and the failure is called a fool.
Extended Reading
-
Steve Jobs: I'm poorly made.
-
John Sculley: Just relax.
Steve Jobs: Why?
John Sculley: I don't know. No one's ever asked me that question.