Before reading the introduction, I was very cliche that the theme of the movie would be the inner expression of jobs. After watching the movie, I was convinced by the depth of the screenwriter! Sorkin's style, at first glance, is not very suitable for biographical subject matter. However, just like the famous saying of jobs: different thinking, who said he was making a biography? The movie not only successfully chose a screenwriter, but also successfully chose an actor! Although there is a big difference in appearance, but, different thinking! Do I have to find a clone? Fa Shark's performance is not contrived at all! I even feel that the script follows his style! Compared with the "Macbeth" I watched a few days ago, there is less heavy facial makeup, and in this movie, the details of his facial expressions can be more clearly felt. Winslet's performance was flawless, her dress and hairdo were just right to hide her sexiness, and a pair of glasses framed her hard-working role. However, whether it is the reader or Ross, I always think that her acting skills are still at the second level. Perhaps, the smooth journey is doomed to her lack of depth. Jeff Dennis' presence was a failure, at least for anyone who saw "The Newsroom." He repeatedly appeared behind the scenes of the thunderous applause, which always made me think he was here for a news interview! The style of the whole film is tough, but there is still one scene that moved me: when the jobs were in the parking lot on the roof, I watched my daughter wear a brick-sized Walkman around her waist for more than ten years. He said, 500 songs, or 1,000 songs. ! I'm going to put 500, or 1,000 pieces of music in your pocket! Jobs may not be a successful father, but under the appearance of a great designer, he has a heart that loves his daughter like all fathers! Just this comment, pay tribute to the protagonist of this film, who was also the protagonist of an era, Steve jobs!
View more about
Steve Jobs reviews