I'm really surprised that this movie can still pass 6 points.
This was originally a bloody YY work that was almost equivalent to a domestic anti-Japanese drama.
The only thing that counts as a bonus is the special effects and the Governor's appearance, so I gave it 2 stars.
If there were no more gorgeous special effects and feelings for the governor, this should have been a negative part of the movie.
As a movie, you can exaggerate on the "base setting" - it can even be a compliment (creative).
However, a movie with an exaggerated basic setting must have a self-consistent logic that can justify it.
It's a pity, however, that I haven't watched such a movie that logically looks like a three-year-old child without realism for a long time.
The last time I saw it, it was probably Yan Shuangying.
why do i say that,
I won't talk about the small problems, just two big grooves that are completely unpleasant:
First, how can Mexico become "the last hope of the human resistance"?
This is completely unreasonable logically.
Even if Western movies habitually do not count China, Mexico, in Western countries, does not have the possibility of becoming a resistance base at all.
Mexico is characterized by gangs, drugs, and freedom.
Freedom is okay, but how can a free-spirited character become a "Rebel"?
Are there free and loose rebels throughout human history?
Secondly, in order to become a resistance base, you must at least have basic "resistance ability", right?
I'm not talking about guns, but basic research equipment in the face of "artificial intelligence".
Guns have never been the key to human resistance to artificial intelligence. The key is the basic technological society and technological talents.
How could Mexico get these?
Second, why did the heroine become the leader of the resistance army?
To put it bluntly, this movie is purely for women's rights and women's rights.
For this reason, even logically, the objective basis for whether the heroine has become a leader is completely abandoned.
John was able to become a leader because of a father who came from the future and a mother who taught him leadership standards from an early age.
He showed high intelligence and ability from an early age.
But what about the heroine?
what does she have?
Age is already a very big logical issue, and I won't talk about why the future heroine looks younger than the current heroine. The most important thing is that at the moment when the heroine used her mouth to recover a group of homeless people in the movie, I was so embarrassed that I felt uncomfortable.
This is more difficult to accept than Naruto's mouth escape.
Even if Naruto's mouth escape is logically reasonable, it makes people complain, and the heroine's mouth escape is completely without any logical rationality.
The funniest thing is that I really don't understand an ordinary girl who has never received any elite education/physical training/fighting skills training since childhood.
How did he become the new "king" in Mexico, which is full of gangsters, drug lords, and private armed forces.
This is completely unreasonable logically.
To become the leader of the resistance army is to be far beyond ordinary people in terms of personal strength, intelligence, and charm.
John did it by training from an early age and being a prophet of the future.
What is the heroine for?
In fact, such a woman is often the first to die when that global catastrophe strikes.
Even if you want to play feminism, can you give a logical basic character design?
Can you beat the robot by relying on the Virgin? Can you become the leader of the rebel army by relying on the Virgin and Mouth?
Director, are you serious? ? ?
I am very suspicious, is the director essentially an anti-feminist, so he played a high-level black?
View more about Terminator: Dark Fate reviews
