I'm very dissatisfied with the ending design of Amy's refusal to marry the rich second generation to Laurie.
What exactly is love? Is there really love? Or that "love" is just a beautiful dream made up by writers and poets with the concept of fantasy for hundreds of years.
Amy's marriage with the boy she liked when she was young is called love. Isn't it love to choose a mature husband who can help you in all aspects for the family? I do not think so. When Laurie humiliates Amy and her fiancé at their reunion dance, Amy actually feels that Amy's balance is in favor of her fiancé when she comes forward. Moreover, the author inconsistently distinguishes Laurie's feelings for Amy from his and Joe's, claiming that it is a "different kind of love and feeling". Isn't the love between Amy and Fu Erdai also a form of "different love"? I have absolutely no way to be happy about their union, I just deeply and deeply sadden that Amy, the only sober woman in Little Women's family, has been fooled by the so-called "love" that she is such a sober and self-aware woman. The dramatic ending should be avoided.
I used to think that when I grew up, I read less books, and the older I grew up, the more vulgar I became. But I don't think so now. The problem is not me, but these literary and artistic works, which make the teenagers who have been immersed in them for a long time have too many unrealistic fantasies, and then suffer from the strange disease of being out of touch with society. I have the same question as Li Yinhe: "Why has no one ever doubted whether love is real?" Whether love exists or not, like many relationships, is only to satisfy narcissism, and it is only the projection of one's inner self on others. ?
If it is, then it is easy to explain, everything people do is to satisfy themselves; it is also easy to recognize, there is no difference in love, it is for each to get what he needs. Those who are still worried about their own bread tomorrow, who have the right to accuse Amy of not following her heart and living a less than ideal life?
I think someone will criticize me: The purpose of education is to know yourself, well, you have now reshaped your concept, you are free to inherit the education you received before, why must you criticize who is Good and who is bad? Funny, the question is how many teenagers like me, how much choice do they really have, and how quickly can they wake up? As ignorant as a child, immersed in the world of adult writing, I was instilled with a lot of chicken soup like this, or the author's own obscenity, but later found that the reality is not like the book, while self-doubt, and regain the rules of adapting to society , is it not cruel to them?
But one thing is certain, in the play, Qiao compromised the rewriting of the characters for the royalties, revealing that most of the creation itself is not from the original intention, but the product of compromise with reality. Then people who read them don't have to take it too seriously, and not all the books in the book are as beautiful as jade, and they are worthy of being held in the palm of their hands as a standard.
View more about Little Women reviews
