The male protagonist is a neutral character, good and bad, and the interpretation is very objective. He has a side of a gangster and a side of love for his father. Although he is a jerk, he is not guilty of death, and he has always been naive and immature. I admire my father's persistence in self-discipline. For five years, I have been recalling in my heart that he pretended to take a walk with his wife. This is the power of faith. He still maintains himself in a vicious environment. Here is his religious belief. The police couldn't resist the pressure of public opinion and looked for scapegoats. Even after finding the murderer, they were unwilling to take the blame. It turned out that this was the reason of the case investigators. It was very objective. The director showed this very well, giving us enough motivation to suspect the case investigators . It's a pity that in the end, the investigators of the year were looking for new scapegoats. Many cases have this possibility. They participated in the handling of the case and did not sign a signature. If the official position is small, they may be signed. Then, in the end, it is these people who take the blame. The real villain is still fine, which is very worrying, which is the blank at the end! There are so few descriptions of lawyers here, why would she do this? Motivation? But I absolutely admire that so many big guys want to offend, litigate for others for no reason, and even decide to help her without contact Justice! It's also good for lawyers, at least this is a sensational case, maybe because of this case, there will be a steady stream of cases in the future! It is also a considerable honor for a lawyer! For me, if I really got in touch with this person and knew these facts, I would help him, because I can't imagine an innocent person being in prison for so long, it's too painful, I graft his pain on myself , so I will choose to help, and once I succeed, I will also profit, so feelings + interests, there are enough reasons to support me to do this. As an ordinary person, I think I should be more objective when dealing with this kind of case, because a person who has been convicted of a crime may not be guilty, or he may be wronged; even if he is released, he may be guilty and escaped. Dare to believe. What makes me wonder is how to stop this from happening? Is there something wrong with the program? It is hoped that this kind of injustice will severely punish those officials. It is a fluke to hope that it would be better if they persisted for 7 days at the beginning. Of course, it is not realistic, because some people may persist until they die and are tortured to death. There are demonstrations and protests here, but there is really no way to do it. The power of the media and the power of public opinion are used, and I am forced to do so. The last title is good, because of the father's name, the male protagonist rectifies the father's name for the small, and the justice for the big. Under such circumstances, an individual's inadvertent words and deeds can easily push him to the position of the public enemy of the people. Position, in the case of not killing enough people to be angry, the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the protection of human rights are a little weak. Public opinion does play a very important role, but when public opinion can decide life and death, tragedy will happen.
View more about In the Name of the Father reviews
