The film clearly explains how good storytelling can take the place of space. At first, because the writer's reasoning ability was really a crotch for his character setting, I was once very suspicious of the meaning of this character's existence. After all, he has no role in the subsequent development of the plot. The detective is still touching the door frame when he solves the puzzle, which is really sorry for his profession. However, at the beginning of the review, it was discovered that the addition of this character made the relationship between the three explained with two kisses at the beginning of the movie. In the dialogue that followed, the background of the story was completely explained, and it all happened in one room. This also brings up a new problem. If the appearance of the writer is necessary, and he has been given the character of a reasoning writer, if he is given some opportunities to solve the case in the later development, this character should be more complete.
With the male protagonist's IQ, when the writer persuaded him to take the blame, he said that the deceased put the key back after opening the door. He should have sweated all over at that time, but he was unconscious.
In the end, I really want to complain about this writer. After the husband found out about the extramarital affair, he actually tried to persuade him to take the blame. The reason is that you will be in prison for a few years at most and my girlfriend is going to die. In the process of watching, I kept expecting that this was the writer trying to trick the male protagonist, but as a result, he was really so eccentric.
View more about Dial M for Murder reviews
