First of all, when the professor woke up from the hospital, it was obvious that he had amnesia and had no other trauma except his forehead, and he could communicate with the female doctor fluently. Sui Guojue doesn't seem to be at all like the fear of arriving home and the contradiction between the plot and not wanting to cause trouble. The photos taken by the camera at the female doctor's house reflect the excellence of the doctor, but this is only for the audience, and the professor did not notice it. After that, the female doctor's familiarity with theology and epic is doubtful. At the same time, the female doctor deliberately I took back the professor's clothes, but after the professor found the airtight tube, he showed excessive panic, and it was completely unreasonable to know that it was used and had not seen it before. When he was admitted to the hospital, he changed his clothes, and he must have rummaged through it in order to find the identification documents. Based on many doubts and unknowns, the professor actually chose not to believe the embassy because of the policewoman's pursuit and murder. The embassy believed that the doctor who was not acquainted and who was inconsistent in saving people was very suspicious of whether the professor had amnesia or his head was squeezed. And why is the International Health Organization carrying a gun? There is no basis for a female doctor and a professor to run away together. Normally, they should walk separately. Obviously, these people are looking for the professor. In theory, it has nothing to do with the doctor. The most dangerous thing is that she runs with you. The professor actually asked I thought it was a companion without asking, and laid the groundwork for the final betrayal. The plot was too blunt. There are too many logical loopholes. As for the acting skills of the actors, the old actors are all good, but the female killer is too blunt, just like a gorilla. I didn't see it as a novice, only saw the recklessness. The setting is empty, and the acting skills are generally unimpressive. The image of the heroine in this play is too empty. He and the virus maker should have been in love theoretically, but no one noticed her in the play. At the same time, the motive of the heroine is ambiguous. Is it because of love or the same idea? Continue to make a past, this is destroying the world, and the heroine is not an impulsive little girl without faith and identity, how can she be determined not to die to complete it? The three villains are basically too weak to stand, resulting in extremely weak plot conflicts and less exciting than Da Vinci.
View more about Inferno reviews
