I don't want to give a passing score, and I can hardly watch it except for a little time at the beginning and end. Only after watching the movie did I realize that Langdon is from Cambridge, WHO can be abused by grass, the silver-haired beauty is neither silver-haired nor beautiful at all, Agent Brüder, a well-hidden good person, turned into a bioweapon seller. The bad guy, the provost and Sienna are even more weird. The provost drew his knife when he disagreed, and was stabbed to death in the end. Sienna didn't see the cleverness at all except for a few strong explanations. What about acupoints? What about their charitable background? She also died in the end. Is she the heroine? On the contrary, it was Sinsky's junior third who had an affair with Langdon. It's amazing, my sister. The character design can be changed casually or such a large change, who can accept it who has read the original work. Even if the characters are not discussed, the film has always been forced to bring the rhythm. For example, Langdon cracked the cerca trova by talking to himself, and he saw at a glance that it was the Faraday indicator. Heaven 25 actually knew it from the beginning. , Another example is that the Hall of Five Hundred People can be entered casually, the Baptistery can be entered casually, and the WHO may not want to find Langdon at all, otherwise the two of them can just run away and dump the WHO? In the original book, Zobrist was deliberately angry with the WHO, and after the virus was released, the clue, the Faraday indicator, was given to Sinsky. Naturally, the movie could not wipe out half of the world's population, so the Faraday indicator was arranged on Zobrist. I just wanted to ask, why did he take this kind of thing with him and why did he set up this game? Couldn't he just throw the virus into the crowd? The logic from start to finish simply doesn't hold up. Can this movie be watched?
View more about Inferno reviews
