Because this was originally a story of two women robbing a man. The conflict between the stepmother and Cinderella is nothing but competition for two men, one is Cinderella's father and the other is the prince. Listen to the old-fashioned, why are they robbing? It seems that many women are robbing in the legend, so why? The stepmother said, in order to survive. "Fate! Survive!" In a big house, the stepmother, stepsister, and orphaned daughter had a scuffle. The standard of this house fighting novel is really not leaking. In the cage, the appearance of eating must not look good. Grabbing the red envelopes can still have four or six openings. After grabbing the red envelopes, you can look at each other with a smile and lose your grudges, but grabbing a man is a life-and-death thing, especially when a man is the only way to survive, the picture must be too beautiful dare not look. Therefore, the background of the house fight also threw the screenwriter into a cage. As long as the basic framework of the stepmother and stepdaughter remains unchanged, it is difficult to sublimate the two parties to any high-level free will awakening, unlike "Maleficent", which can come to an enemy. Turn the subversion of true love into a reinterpretation that makes people forget what they watched in childhood. After all, the original work of the latter is not about men and property. Speaking of which, I'm very curious about how Disney is going to make up "Snow White". To learn the transformation of "Maleficent", "The Little Mermaid" is probably easier.
Having said that, animals in cages are easy to be violent, and humans in closed houses are easy to tear up. House fighting is definitely not good for physical and mental health, so teenagers should go out more when they have time. During the filming process, I couldn't help thinking about one question: If the stepmother and the heroine can work, then everything can be broken. With an income, Queen Kate will not come to this house, nor will she squeeze a house with a girl who has no blood relationship in the house, and she can also avoid the blackening and dimorphism of herself and her daughter... I think so Sure enough, the biggest BOSS in this film is actually the society at that time. Whose fault is it? (muddy)
In such a world that is not enough to let the birds fly, the stepmother still said a few truths within her power. The true love of the past is no match for the fact that she cannot survive after the death of her husband. Remarriage is mainly for financial resources. How can it seem more than for love passive. A monologue hidden in the shadows seems to be about to turn into bitterness and whitewashing, and then just right to reply to the villain's domineering queen style, talking about the world will fall into my hands and destroy hahaha - after all, being a woman The duke is more at ease on his own than on his husband. Although this paragraph did not dig deeply, and Queen Kate's ambition soon disappeared. Then, Disney's attitude towards ambition is not very clear, but Queen Kate is indeed very truthful and real. But that doesn't mean that she's not bad. She is bad when she wants to control the whole country or something, and uses secret tricks everywhere. However, Kate's performance has a bad and destined sense of joy. It is more playful than the male and female protagonists combined. The whole process is rich in expressions and various concave poses, which is quite comical. Disney invited her to GJ. Following the world's first and second-oldest veteran group, the Disney Princess group, let's open a female BOSS group. Now there are at least two members.
Actually, I don't really care if this movie brings back the dreamy feeling of childhood memories. After all, we have watched a lot of adaptations of Cinderella from childhood to adulthood, and the visual effects of various blockbusters have never disappointed in recent years (I am super happy to see the gorgeous sight of pumpkins turning into carriages and Cinderella's blue dress flying! ) The theme of kindness and tolerance is beyond doubt in any era. So I pay more attention to things that are not the same as before, especially compared to the 1950 animated film that was also from Disney. In order to make the whole story look more scientific, the screenwriter still took some pains, such as adding an early encounter with the prince and princess as a civilian, which gave Cinderella a proper reason for insisting on going to the dance, instead of Like in the animation, it looks like it's purely aimed at a crown that has never been seen before. In the animation, the prince and his lover are face-to-face and suffer from facial blindness. He can only recognize people by means of crystal shoes, which makes people wonder which is Cinderella's body, and whether the prince loves women or foot fetish (hello). Anyway, the prince in the movie looks at people first and then shoes. Help him breathe a sigh of relief and give him a stamp of true love. At the end of the story, the stepmother lost her ambition and fled far away; the heroine won an overall victory and turned around beautifully; it seemed to be a complete success. However, the situation of the stepmother has not changed. In the future, she will have to rely on a man to survive, and this time she will rely on an unreliable Lord Duke. And Cinderella's mentality is also unknown. I don't know if she has listened to her stepmother's monologue seriously, and whether she can see through it as soon as possible. Thinking about it this way, there is a little sadness lurking under the happy ending.
Useful ideas are all time-sensitive. If the weakest bud dares to be the first, it will be enough to rouse the deaf ears, and the most powerful argument will be reduced to the same old tune if there is no innovation. If "Maleficent" appeared ten and a hundred years later, when people have deeply agreed with the concepts it promotes and become accustomed to it, its slightly fragmented plot and weak emotional transformation will become tasteless. ; But it appears in the present, an era that has admired the love between men for thousands of years, but still does not believe in the deep relationship between women. Of course, the meaning is different. The rewriting of "Cinderella" this time is not as strong as that of "Maleficent", but given that Disney's big game has just begun, the pioneering spirit revealed by it is still worthy of encouragement.
Well, of course it's not just a story about robbing a man, it's a story about love, a story about a beautiful fantasy, a story about America being a globalized open country where Asians, Africans, Indians come together, and one-size-fits-all The story of a girl with no future or a super high heel that focuses not only on beauty but also on comfort, and so on. All in all, about the relationship between these two women, it's not bad to shoot like this.
View more about Cinderella reviews
