The film is written and starred by Jason Segel, a simple and honest man, and is accompanied by British beauty Emily Blunt. What seems to be the interpretation is the legendary story of dragging marriage and breaking up in two. What is commendable is that this time the story teller turned out to be a U.S. national who has always been known for his independent personality. It is a lot of surprise. From Tom Hanks’s "Larry Crowe" warning everyone not to divorce and repay the loan together, to "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" gave a vicious lesson to Xiaosan, to the extremely crazy "American Pie 4", all subtly subtly. It's best to start to advertise traditional love. It's too avant-garde to play and can't stand it. It's too uncomfortable.
Although this is still an Apato production, it is obviously much more restrained than "To the Greek Theater" and "Bridesmaids". It's just that the bridge segment is too far-fetched and the ending is too idealistic. If after the two broke up, the male protagonist is not a "teenage" girl and the female protagonist is not caught by unspoken rules, the ending will be completely different, perhaps tragedy or comedy. Of course, this is not the focus of this lawsuit. "Not making a decision is actually the worst decision." Dare to love and dare to marry. This is the love concept expressed in the film, which is sublimated than the heavy tastes of low-level evil tastes Quite a lot worthy of encouragement.
View more about The Five-Year Engagement reviews