I have a habit of reading movie reviews after watching a movie, because some movie reviews will make me understand the movie more deeply or from different angles, and see more things from it.
I know that no matter how good things are, there will be negative reviews, but since the movie came out, I have been thinking, where will the negative reviews of such a good movie start from?
Damn, what kind of bullshit is patriarchy and feminism! there is no end
This reminds me of Zhao Lei's "A Thirty-Year-Old Woman".
This song is the writer's admiration and distress for a thirty-year-old woman beside him. In my opinion, it is a simple and calm love letter.
However, there are still people clamoring to hurt their "rights"!
"What's wrong with thirty years old, I'm still young"
"I have no wrinkles in my thirties"
…………
Similar to this kind of rhetoric a lot and then started to extend feminism
Are you sick? How are you 30 years old and how do you care about other people's shit? Are people talking about you? Are people talking about you? I can't see that people are complimenting the thirty-year-old woman, is it full of love? If you feel angry, don't listen. This kind of person is like watching a horror movie when you are timid, and then complaining that the horror movie scared her... Horror movies forced you to watch?
far away...
What I want to say is, don't associate everything with feminism, okay? I do not deny that part of the plot of the movie is about the status of Indian women, but it is different from what is now called "feminism"!
Today's feminism has never been the pursuit of equality and freedom, but just to stand on the advantage of rights.
Some film critics said that the father played by Aamir Khan is not paternal love, but patriarchal power! Come, come, tell me what is fatherly love and what is fatherhood? You are clamoring for women's rights, but you are dissatisfied with the sacrifices made by others for the status of women. From a family's point of view, the father's training of his daughter is indeed harsh, but if you look at this whole thing from the perspective of women's status in India, It's a sacrifice.
Cutting hair does not mean surrendering to patriarchy, but a kind of resistance. Why should women have long hair, and who the hell stipulates that short hair is patriarchal?
When a common sense is broken in the early stages, it will always lead to some criticism, and I respect your dislikes and low ratings. But can you not deny everything from the perspective of feminism and patriarchy, which is very powerless and self-contradictory?
Moreover, your remarks have nothing to do with feminism, just a clamor in a disadvantaged state.
View more about Dangal reviews
