I would say, he finds your analytical skills intimidating.
It has its costs. Learning to see the puzzle in everything. They're everywhere. Once you start looking,it's impossible to stop. It just so happens that people and all the deceits and delusions that inform everything they do, tend to be the most fascinating puzzles of all.
Of course,they don't alsways appreciate being seen as such.
"Seems like a lonely way to live."
"As I said,it has its costs "When
saying this, Fu's desk was full of various handcuffs, and he was trying to challenge (untie) one by one. Handcuffs can be a metaphor, which is what he calls "interesting puzzles." Some people enjoy solving puzzles and are good at it. But others don't like to be seen through to nothing, it feels very "intimidating". So the price for people who see through everything is loneliness.
The British are the best at recreating the original work. The BBC has done "Shakespeare Reproduced". "Sherlock" can also be regarded as a kind of "Holmes Reappearance". The brilliant lines and countless allusions are cleverly embedded. The British will be ingenious. Borrowing the double meaning of "fall", they even went to the swamp to get a hunting dog out. There are also all kinds of humor, irony and human touch that show the relationship between the characters; the British play so trendy and so elegant.
Americans don't need to compete in the direction where the British are best, it is smart to find another way. So everything is modern. Every case of high IQ crimes, the living conditions of modern urbanites, and classic deductions. Under the conditions of modern intelligence, what kind of development should it look like? Doesn't any science need to be advanced? It's just that everything is under rational analysis, just like overlooking the city where you live from a high altitude, so cold and realistic.
Compared with the US version, the criminals in each episode are aimed at money; then the English version of the criminals are simply artists. The American version of Sherlock Holmes had to accept the rules of survival in the real world. At first, he accepted Watson because of the threat of his father letting him go to sleep on the street. In the third episode, he threatened to prevent Watson from revealing his drug history. Accuse her (Is this imaginable in the British version? It is impossible for Fu Fu to say such a thing, although he has tricked Watson many times.) In the fourth episode, he tried to spend the banker’s money, claiming to be "wealth redistribution." "(Very familiar tone). The English version of Fu, oh, I am a gentleman; Moriarty is more like a punk for burning; can Irene be counted as a criminal, an out-of-print stunner who wanders between good and evil.
But the American version of Fuhe criminals is closer to real modern people; Fu is a little bit traumatic in his heart, and the little loneliness of a too smart person, so his little bad habits can be regarded as ordinary modern diseases. As for the criminals, they are really cold and shrewd calculations. The supremacy of interests is even more a common problem of modern people! The American murderers don’t commit crimes with passion. It’s too stupid and uneconomic; they never do anything for grandiose purposes. They don’t use emotions. They never make mistakes. They expected the police at first. Response, behavioral procedures and possible investigative methods. So they can make people shine not because they are "so smart", but because they are "too smart", "too good at hiding themselves" and so on.
Therefore, it is destined that the US version cannot surpass the English version in terms of character charm, but the US version is still very exciting. On the contrary, it is worrying that it has too many episodes, and I hope that it can maintain the level in the future.
View more about Elementary reviews
