This is pure witchcraft. I watched the extended blu-ray version. Let's just talk about the three hours of the Blu-ray Extended Edition. To be honest, I watched it for 3 hours. Why do people think it can't be read, it's verbose. Because there is no rhythm. Regardless. He was able to win the 84th Oscar nominations entirely because the subject matter took advantage of it. In terms of kung fu, it really is nothing.
First of all, I have no objection to the shaking of handheld photography, nor do I dislike such ideographic films. It's just that this movie is called the real two ends. 1. You can tell the tragic ending and fate of this family, especially the eldest son. Shake and shoot with no problem. But suddenly a lot of things that seem to be expressive are added. Pictures of computer screensavers, pictures of the universe. I know what you mean. to tell. But the addition is too hard, it is really straight up. I shot a lot of wide-angle scenes, that is, it has nothing to do with the psychological state of the characters, and it has nothing to do with the main story. To be honest, the audience is not treated like a human being. I don't mean it either, I just stuff the materials and dynamic screensavers into it, and I don't want to see it.
Another, put all the materials, space, mountains and rivers, plants and animals. It doesn't matter if you cut and talk from the macro to the micro. It's also very good, if you want to say something, say it well. nor. The two forms are forcibly added together, resulting in a four dissimilarities. There is no energetic movie like Jiang Wen said, nor Quentin's rubber band theory. There is no rhythm, it is flat and straightforward, and then it is broadcast when it is broken up.
I don't know how to deceive so many big actors to play such a thing. Talking about the children's side, compared with "Boyhood", it is not bullshit. Engage in a handheld camera to express this set, and match the "Knight of the Holy Grail". Not pure either, shit is not. The materials are all mixed cuts, which basically have nothing to do with the main line of the movie. For the wide-angle shot of the opening scene, let's look at Ridley and Kubrick and compare how the scene materials are used. The relationship between the material and the theme. A comparison, or bullshit is not.
In short, it's just pretending to be an artist, and it's not a day off. Pretend B doesn't take the audience as a person. This is what happened.
View more about The Tree of Life reviews
