There are two components of the constitution. The diginifed and the efficient. The efficient answered to the diginified and the diginified only answer to the God.
I'm wondering why European royal families have existed for so long, and how long can they survive, aside from sloppy explanations like natural theocracy? In 9012, the royal family had been reduced to gossip cooking, with ordinary looks, intelligence, talent and even virtue. Why should taxpayers pay for it? Therefore, Queen Elizabeth II does not dare to abdicate. Charles has a poor mass base and it is difficult to convince the public. At that time, it is very likely that the coffin board will not be able to hold down. The queen was very young when she took the throne, but she always managed carefully, even at the expense of her sister's happiness, to maintain the authority of the royal family, so what is Diana? The people who eat melons only know that the civilianization of royal family members is not in line with the trend of the times, and most of them complain about the injustice of Concubine Dai. However, the Queen is very clear that the result of civilianization is "what do you want you to do?". Even if there is only the face, subsidies and ostentation of "retreat to the point of no return", it is difficult to sustain in an equal rights society. Even if it is written in the constitution, there is no immortal emperor that can last forever, because there will always be new authorities, in different forms. The people will bow to the diginified anyway. Hope the diginified can still answer to the God.
View more about The Crown reviews
