Pioneering works of animal protectionism

Nadia 2022-04-22 07:01:08

Recently, I was criticized for watching dark movies (Prison Break, 24, Homeland Security, House of Cards, Game of Thrones, Criminal Minds, Last Ship, Newsroom, Daybreak, etc.), so I found a literary film to watch. Last week, I saw that the "Beijing News" literary section was promoting this film. Of course, Xiao Qingqing may say that Nima is the ultimate commercial film. But at least no one died in it.

1961's Breakfast at Tiffany's is actually a pioneering work of animal protectionism. Or to use the advanced theory of the left, animal protection itself is also a politically incorrect formulation. All things grow and all living beings are equal. Cats are not inferior to humans, do you want you to protect them? Every swordsman should study cats. They are quiet as shadows and as light as feathers (Thrones S1E4).
The original title of this movie should be "The Talking Green Tea Bitch, The Pan Man and the Cat", or "Cats: Connecting the Green Tea Bitch and the Cat" Receiver's Bond".
The cat has a big role in this film, but it doesn't have a name. Robot cats have names. The cast at the beginning of the episode just says CAT, with the name of the trainer as an auxiliary in parentheses. Female pig's feet pointed out this seriously: I don't have the right to name it, we don't belong to each other.
There are many scenes of cats in the film. The cat perches poetically on the top of the cabinet, and the cat walks proudly on the head of the person. Cats are not to be molested, but appear independent and self-respect in a world that humans think they rule. There are also shots from the cat's perspective, such as the female pig's feet and the male pig's feet before they were caught and returned from playing, and the cat looked at the stupid human beings who were about to doom and didn't know it with pity from the window.
The male pig's feet in all facets were begging the female pig's feet to "receive the offer" until the end, but when the female pig's feet drove the cat out of the car, the male pig's feet suddenly had a small universe of humiliation and death. , scolded the female pig's feet wildly, and then followed the cat. The director then arranged for the female pig's feet to repent (different from the original), the female pig's feet got off the car, and passed the male pig's feet without saying a word or hug, but looking for cats all over the street. Because she knew that if she couldn't find a cat, no matter how bitterly she cried, threw her arms around her, winked and discharged her eyes, she would not be able to restore the determined heart of the male pig's feet.
The final outcome is of course a bridge, there will always be bread, and the cat will always find it. The female pig's feet found the cat, so she had the confidence, capital, confidence and legitimacy to kiss the male pig's feet, and in order to prevent the cat's ancestors from suddenly running away when they were passionate (this would cause the male and female portraits to be pulled out) Hepburn also stuffed the cat into his clothes and covered his chest, which is also quite hard, but have you considered the cat's feelings?

View more about Breakfast at Tiffany's reviews

Extended Reading

Breakfast at Tiffany's quotes

  • Holly Golightly: He's all right! Aren't you, cat? Poor cat! Poor slob! Poor slob without a name! The way I see it I haven't got the right to give him one. We don't belong to each other. We just took up one day by the river. I don't want to own anything until I find a place where me and things go together. I'm not sure where that is but I know what it is like. It's like Tiffany's.

    Paul Varjak: Tiffany's? You mean the jewelry store?

    Holly Golightly: That's right. I'm just CRAZY about Tiffany's!

  • Holly Golightly: I'm like cat here, a no-name slob. We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to each other.