View more about Breakfast at Tiffany's reviews
So be it!
Eliezer 2022-04-22 07:01:08
It's retro movie time again. Audrey Hepburn's "Breakfast at Tiffany's" in 1961 has been heard for a long time, but she has never particularly wanted to see it. Her work has only been seen in "Roman Holiday" before. Because I just saw an introduction about Hepburn recently, I downloaded some of her works. To be honest, I don’t like this movie very much, the transitions are not very coherent and reasonable, and the plot is exaggerated, but the identity design of the male and female protagonists is quite special, and it is estimated that it is not easy to pass the self-censorship of the film company (the man is a fostered writer). , the woman is an on-call social woman). Hepburn's charm is indeed invincible. Although it is not as young, fresh and lovely as in "Roman Holiday" (she is more than 10 years older in this film), her acting skills are more developed, and her dress is very noble, elegant and charming, and you can still watch it~
Extended Reading
-
Holly Golightly: He's all right! Aren't you, cat? Poor cat! Poor slob! Poor slob without a name! The way I see it I haven't got the right to give him one. We don't belong to each other. We just took up one day by the river. I don't want to own anything until I find a place where me and things go together. I'm not sure where that is but I know what it is like. It's like Tiffany's.
Paul Varjak: Tiffany's? You mean the jewelry store?
Holly Golightly: That's right. I'm just CRAZY about Tiffany's!
-
Holly Golightly: I'm like cat here, a no-name slob. We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to each other.