A film from 50 years ago, I didn't get distracted at all for two hours. It can be seen that beautiful women are enough to support a movie, hahaha, of course, the kind of beautiful women who are not born in the world. No, what about my Vivien Leigh, alas, there were several such natural beauty that women couldn't take their eyes off of in those days.
Audrey Hepburn is not really my cup of tea. I will instinctively rebel against any person or thing that is unconditionally worshipped as a god. But she does deserve such praise. I didn't expect that she was not playing the role of a goddess or an innocent girl. I have never believed in this role, or did not want to admit that she was a high-class prostitute. And her smart and innocent eyes really remind me of Scarlett. What I love the most is not the way she eats a croissant at Tiffany's door. I think she is the most beautiful at home, wearing an orange-pink nightgown, with a slender waist in her hands. However, beauties don't take off their makeup even if they sleep in the rain, hahahaha, the makeup is too delicate. Hair is called highlights, as it is now said, and it is not ordinary people at first glance. Today's female stars, whether sweet or sexy, don't have the same taste as they used to be.
The story is actually pretty good, and it's a bit deep. The male protagonist is too bleak, and I still don't remember his uncharacteristic appearance. Is Tiffany's an advertising placement? No, is it an investor? Even if you spend a lot of money to promote a movie with your own name, it's really worth it.
View more about Breakfast at Tiffany's reviews
