A traditional superhero kills one person in ten steps and never stays for a thousand miles. After the matter is gone, he will hide his merit and fame deeply. They acted so calmly, punishing crimes and then returning home with beauty. We envied them, projected ourselves deeply on the heroic image, and imagined that one day I would also have superpowers by accident, and then walked away with confidence.
But the legend of the hero is only a legend after all. This film can be regarded as an anti-hero movie. I don’t know if there is a precedent for this kind of theme film. This is the first time I have seen it. The hero in the play is usually a hardcore loser from childhood to adulthood, and even after becoming a "hero", there is no such thing as "talking, laughing, and captive" of traditional heroes.
He punished the crime by accidentally wounding several people with a pipe wrench. Because he jumped in the line, he beat them to death. His partner was knocked off his head.
However, when he finally knocked down the final boss and shouted "It's not right to jump in the line" I think all the losers like mine must recognize him in their hearts, at least for that second. What is good and what is evil? Forgive or resist? I don’t know, all I know is that it’s not right to jump in the queue! ! !
The film is a story of "realistic heroes", but after all, it is not realistic enough. At least no one can go through countless shit luck like the protagonist to be brilliant and save their lives.
As for us, not lucky supermen, how should we deal with ourselves in this unruly world? "Jumping in the line is no way" and who is going to do justice? To stay alive or not to be called a shining self-destruction? Just like Hamlet Murmured to ourselves, we thought there was no answer, but we might have lived out the answer.
2012.9.22
View more about Super reviews