The plot is not enough for Easter eggs to make up? If you want a movie to rely on Easter eggs and IP to support it, why make a movie and directly build a theme park? If you can’t think of a way to highlight the protagonist’s awesomeness, it will limit the villain. IQ and strength? What is the operation of firing tanks directly when you are still fighting with the protagonists in the building? It doesn't matter whether the tank has been able to accurately target the target of the attack by the human unit, or it doesn't matter if you are killed by yourself? No commander with a brain can't be like this. In the end, seeing that the protagonist group is going to leave, there is no chance to meet the big boss. In order to let the protagonist group complete the task, the big boss directly sends the big boss a thousand miles. It is also a movie with modern war scenes as its selling point. Let's see how the Black Hawk fell. It is understandable that the film types are different, and it is understandable that there is a protagonist's halo, but at least it is not too much to make the plot reasonable, right? Lz compares the women's federation, Godzilla, Transformers, etc. with this movie and vaguely demeans those movies, but I really don't know what is the difference between this movie and those, or even the Pleasant Goat watched by domestic children. the difference. Regarding one point, I very much agree with the landlord's view. With the changes of the times, the technology of the film will become outdated, and the aesthetics will also become outdated. But what the landlord did not point out is that the plot of the movie is the only thing that will never go out of style. Regardless of the era, the plot is always one of the important indicators for evaluating a movie. No matter what era a movie is in, no matter how gorgeous the scene is, no matter how loud the IP is, it is a piece of shit without the plot.
View more about The Expendables 3 reviews
