Don't learn Kurosawa like this! The whole film is as gorgeous as it is boneless and flashy !
Take the performance style as an example, the big names in Yishui act in their own way, and their styles are fragmented -Uncle Dao Ming is acting like a drama, Chao Wei Manyu is busy with Wang Jiawei, Jet Li is purely a tool person, Zi Dan Ziyi is completely Soy sauce--in other words, can you find the meaning of the existence of the character Kisaragi? Can you not recruit some saliva of "bringing capital into the group", "director Xiaomi" and "entraining private goods"?
Let's just talk about the male number one issue. Watching "Famous Name", watching "Huo Yuanjia", watching "Ocean Paradise", it can be seen that Jet Li is not a "little white" who can't show contradictions and personality changes, but in "Heroes", the national teacher insists He nailed his character to the cross of "Facial Paralysis" - I once doubted whether Jet Li was blindly concerned about Laomouzi's feelings, and hurried away before he could figure out what kind of mentality "Wuming" was. Ducks on the shelves havetily acted out.
Let's talk about Chen Daoming's role. Throughout the whole film, Ying Zheng's character is quite fragmented - according to his own words, I hope the famous director will not test him like this again. Undoubtedly, the situation of Uncle Daoming is almost the same as that of Jet Li, and he can't keep up with the director's ideas, and he is not sure how to play the first emperor in this film. If you haven't figured out how to express the edges and corners of the characters in the play, how can the characters you create convince the audience?
It was roughly the unpleasant experience of "Hero" , which taught the national teacher a lesson, so that when filming "Shadow", the old man did not insist on using the historical background of the Three Kingdoms, and finally accepted the alternate plot setting. Otherwise, the sick Zhou Yu, the split Xiao Qiao, the evil Sun Quan, plus the one-strand Guan Yu, the good past of the Three Kingdoms is like a coil of mosquito coils - you know, scolding it for distorting history, spending some spit on stars, but also That’s it; those who don’t know, such as foreigners, take this “Flying Over the Madhouse” as the official history to dismantle it, won’t they harm the next generation with it?
Thinking about it carefully, it might be that Hollywood tickets are so expensive that they have to strip off a layer of artistic quality (no way, there are also talented talents like Ang Lee, who also use martial arts movies in exchange for tickets, "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" can't be counted. There are many faults, but it is slightly inferior to Ang Lee's previous work, the family trilogy, "Reclining").
The national teacher talked about Hollywood, but said that the relationship is not good, saying - like "Hero", according to his meaning, it is probably always a lot slower, not so hasty. The movie is a whole that affects the whole body. Maybe the rhythm slows down and other problems will be cured, but from the current point of view, the problem of "Hero" can't be blamed on haste or slow, and it can't be shied away from foreign capital. pot. In the later "Golden Armor in the City", the discourse power of Western capital is not necessarily so great, and the film is as usual "foggy". What's more, the old man said that after ten years of life and death, he is still willing to be a slave of capital - "The Great Wall" compiled by a bunch of foreign editors, he selected half of the big coffee and small coffee in the entertainment industry to form a dinosaur special team. After the three-way drum, he still went out to fight the monsters with bells and whistles.
"Fortunately," fortune and misfortune depend on each other. If it is extremely peaceful, without "Hero", there will be no artistic concept of the national teacher's later landscape stage, and the right should be an early trial for the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games.
View more about Hero reviews
