In short, in my opinion, the first 20 minutes of the whole play are too scattered and confusing. They neither tell people what happened nor clearly express the relationship between the characters, especially rachel for a while, megan for a while, and that for a while. Who was confused when it was time. In the case that the heroine is set to be drunk and fragmented, it makes people even more confused about who she is, whether those fragments are her memory or talking about others, whether they are fantasy or reality, all messed up to the time before and after the case, everyone Just figured out what I was talking about earlier.
In general, the full text is a non-fiction. It records the past events that have memories or the protagonist thinks, and at the same time interspersed with the small past events and backgrounds of several supporting characters. If it is not too long, it is not wrong. The occurrence of megan's death also brought the movie back to the category of normal movies, with logic and development, although you can roughly guess the context after megan has a relationship with his psychiatrist, because megan is a goblin, and she doesn't want the protagonist to have a relationship. There must be a secret in the work of the ex-husband's family. Either the psychiatrist is the murderer (usually not so direct and simple), or the protagonist's ex-husband and megan must have an affair, and then it basically goes smoothly.
Maybe because the case itself is not that complicated, it can't make any elaborate new things. In short, there are still some interesting things to watch after the movie - especially the part where the ex-husband of the heroine was found to be fired has nothing to do with the heroine. It is not a perfect suspense. Drama, but worth watching.
View more about The Girl on the Train reviews
