I read the wrong version of TAT

Rhett 2022-04-22 06:01:02

The reason is that when watching "Criminal Minds", ride invited emily to watch the Soviet extended version of "Solaris", and I became interested! ! I looked down on the Internet, but I started to have doubts. The version I watched may not be the same as the one that ride said=A=

Check it online after reading it. I really found the wrong version. The one that ride said is 1972. It was filmed by director Andrei Tarkovsky in 1988. I fell=A=

but I also saw it. I still remember a small note, and I will add it back to the 1972 version later.

The story of this version in 2002, jokingly said that everyone fell into the hallucination plant of Tibetan horse XD. There is a strange energy on the planet Solaris, and he seems to be alive and consciously bewildering the human beings approaching her. The scientist Dr. Kevin, who was sent to investigate the truth about the space station near Solaris, finally chose to get lost in the illusion created by Solaris and to lead a "happy" life with his reborn wife.

Few characters appeared in the movie, and there were only five people in the main scene. In the end, the only person who returned to reality was Helen, a black female scientist. He firmly believed from the beginning to the end that everyone who met the physical visitors in his memory were all visitors. Because the planet Solaris is disturbing and affecting people's brains.

When you see this, you can understand why the screenwriter asked Ride to mention this drama. Almost all SF dramas are related to psychological, subconscious and spiritual issues. Although the version I watched this time is wrong, I just previewed the plot. The Soviet directors are all SF dramas. There is a very obscure record in making movies. After the preview, it should be able to link up the 72-year version of the movie well. look forward to!

In the film about the rebirth of Kevin’s wife, Leia, who has died, it makes people want to explore the question of whether the clone is a new life form or a substitute for the original consciousness. According to the description in the film, his wife is Solaris. According to Kevin Helen can also see the life form derived from his memory, showing that Leia is indeed a life entity. Although he cannot die from a piece of flesh from the Solaris star, Leia is indeed a life form with independent consciousness. The original deduction might be that everyone was affected by the Solaris star and regarded the illusion in front of him as an entity, but Helen's energy source can completely eliminate the visitor, which directly denied this deduction.

There is a small detail. At the beginning, when Dr. Kevin cut the fruit in his own home in the so-called reality, he accidentally cut his own hand. The cut was very big, and the big one was a bit fake. On the contrary, Solaris was dropped later. In a momentary illusion on the periphery of the star, the wound became real in the scene where Leia was still in the past. Does the director want to give the key to the interpretation to the fans to think about it? ! I fall again! ! ! It's too tender! ! It's too tender to want to surpass the obscure Soviet director! ! ! !



◆ Title: Flying into Space/ Solar Star
◆ Producer: James Cameron
◆ Director: Steven Soderbergh
◆ Screenplay: Steven Soderbergh (Steven Soderbergh)
◆ Starring: George Clooney, George Clooney
, Natascha McElhone,
Jeremy Davies, Jeremy Davies
, Viola Davis
, Ulrich Tukur, Ulrich Tukur
◆ Genre: Fantasy Thriller
◆ Country: USA
◆ Language: English
◆ Publishing Company: 20th Century Fox
◆ Production Company: USA Films (USA Films)
◆ Premiere Date: November 2002 27th
◆ Duration: 99 minutes



Behind the scenes:

This film is adapted from the science fiction novel of the same name by the famous Polish science fiction writer Stanislaw Lamb, and as early as 1972, the famous Tarkovsky had put it on the screen. The novel itself is full of thinking about life, and the version of the old tower is full of introspection and questioning of the soul. This version is full of poetry, and there is a scene where the hero and heroine floats due to weightlessness, like a person in Chagall's paintings, flying in mid-air, which can be called a classic in film history.

At first the director Soderbergh was not very interested in shooting this science fiction film, because he had never filmed a similar subject, and he was not interested in the technology of the future. But when he recalled the novels and movies he had seen, he agreed to 20th Century Fox's invitation to shoot. And James Cameron and Ray Sancini, as well as Lightstorm Entertainment, where Jan Landau is located, spent five years negotiating with Russia to resolve copyright and other issues. For Cameron, shooting "Flying to Space" is almost a fantastic plan. He believes that all the stories in the novel take place in memories and imaginations, so there can be unlimited open space for expression. The news that Soderbergh agreed to film made him very excited. So what we see is the star production team: Cameron, who won the Oscar for "Titanic", and Soderbergh, who won the Oscar for "Drug Network".

Unlike Kubrick and Spielberg, Soderberg did not strongly highlight future high-tech in his shooting, but focused more on the discovery of stories and characters. However, the hardware of science fiction films is still important. The production design of the film Mosina has collaborated with Soderberg in many films such as "11 Arhat" and "Never Compromise". Internal space. The design of the light is also closely related to the plot: "We want to make the'Prometheus' both real and sensible, but also dreamlike."

The themes of Soderbergh's films have changed more and more, from realism "Sex, Lies, and Videotape", to the thrilling "Kafka", the thrilling and humorous "Extreme Relationship", to the complex plot and numerous characters of "Drug Network" and "11 Arhats", he is just like Kafka. Mellon said, as flexible as a chameleon.

[actor]

A psychologist, who has been away from home for a few light years, faces a resurrected wife and other bizarre events, such a role is absolutely difficult to control. The first candidate Soderbergh thought of was George Clooney, who had worked with him in "Extreme Relationship" and "11 Arhats", and the latter was also pleased with his life and cherished this opportunity very much. But Clooney, who does not seem to be an intellectual in any case, is not easy to make his role convincing.

The British actor Natasha McEhorn, who played his wife Leia in the film, has appeared in "Trumen's World", "Saving Picasso", "Rogue" and other films. Soderbergh spoke highly of her: "She reminds me of those extremely good French actresses in the 1960s and 1970s, such as Jeanne Moreau and Dominique Sander. They are witty, sexy and complicated. A woman, not a girl, but a woman." Maybe it makes more sense to expect her performance than the psychologist who expects Clooney?

There are only five roles in the film, among which Jeremy Davis plays the eccentric young scientist Snow. In Soderberg's vision, this character needs to have a strong interaction with other people. His performance must have a weird energy and show a special tension. Jeremy Davis? Yes, that cute and incredible TomTom in "Million Dollar Hotel" is also featured in "Saving Private Ryan". This man once won the Best Newcomer of the Independent Spirit Award for his performance in David O. Russell's "Spanking The Monkeys".

The fourth role is the female scientist Helen, strong-willed, played by Viola Davis, who has worked with Soderberg twice. Gibarian, who died in the beginning, is played by German actor Ulrich Tuco, who is a well-known star in Germany. The videotape in Jibarian's cabin later revealed the truth of everything.


[Gossip]

With Tarkovsky's jade in front, it seems a bit hypocritical to wait and see for Soderbergh's version of "Flying to Space". Especially recently, his "Eleven Arhats" and his independent spiritual work "Frontal Nudity", which seems to be returning to "Sex, Lies and Videotapes", have not been well received. It can only be said that "Flying to Space" makes people sweat, worrying that it will be another Hollywood-style thriller science fiction film.


Recorded on 2011-03-26 14:13

View more about Solaris reviews

Extended Reading
  • Dangelo 2022-04-24 07:01:15

    there are no answers, only choices.

  • Evert 2022-04-22 07:01:36

    Because I mentioned this film again, and found that the score of this film was extremely low, I found it and watched it again. The last time I watched it was in 2008, and when I flipped through the records, I realized that it was marked as "reserved for re-watching". I didn't expect that it would be ten years later... It's really nothing science fiction, just an emotional fable in a science fiction shell. Maybe that's why many people give it low marks. However, it is still inexplicably moved, although I can't explain it clearly... Maybe it is the only movie that makes me indifferent to rating and forgive its pseudo-science fiction truth.

Solaris quotes

  • Rheya Kelvin: Were you alone?

    Chris Kelvin: Yes.

    Rheya Kelvin: Was that difficult?

    Chris Kelvin: It was easier than being with someone else.

  • Chris Kelvin: [quoting Dylan Thomas poem] And death shall have no dominion. Dead men naked they shall be one With the man in the wind and the west moon; When their bones are picked clean and the clean bones gone, They shall have stars at elbow and foot; Though they go mad they shall be sane, Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again; Though lovers be lost love shall not; And death shall have no dominion.