When I saw the plane explode, I yelled at what a fucking end.
Finally, I saw Xiao Xiuxiu's son of a bitch. I see.
I thought it was just a simple, mentally retarded plot and yet another feeble and ridiculous mockery of utilitarianism.
In the end, there was a smile that turned all sentient beings upside down.
The screenwriter is smart not to answer the utilitarian question of the rationality of sacrificing a small part to make the most of the most,
but wisely leads the topic to a more realistic angle
-they need happy ending?
yes, but, bad guy can 't win, it's a morality tale. In
the end bad guy win, and people still live happily ever after.
Utilitarianism wins? Or do we actually hope that there is such a person who controls violence with violence in the dark, so that we can live leisurely and comfortably?
In this way, it is easy to accept the final ending of the movie.
The whole plot can be described as rotten, but this final finishing touch is very questioning.
In the face of such a good situation, the terrorists were eliminated one by one by the freedom guards, the warriors could only move around with their daughters, and the bystanders felt more secure in the abnormal death of terrorists.
We are indifferent, we ignore.
Utilitarianism succeeded, I think. Although the screenwriter did not say it, he used this great situation to express his point of view.
Compared with the hundreds of millions of citizens that the state refers to, the death of one person, ten people, one hundred people, or one thousand people is nothing.
Ugh. What kind of.
Liberals defend, i own myself. you have no right decided my death.
But, you should die for the greatest good.
what the fxck for the greatest good.
View more about Swordfish reviews
