The film itself is very ordinary, the plot is vulgar, there are no valuable scenes and lines, and the suspense is also designed in general. The only reason that attracts me to watch it for 80 minutes is that I am too boring.
There are two highlights, one is the two scenes after 80 minutes, and the other is what I came up with after watching it.
The discussion on how to protect the privacy of people in the online society has never stopped since the end of the last century. There are also many works of art, movies and novels in this regard. However, I personally haven't read it in detail, so when I recalled that Oria after reading it, I was quite afraid. It seems that electrification, automation and networking may indeed create an enemy that we cannot match. Of course, the film itself has a lot of flaws in this regard, so I won't go into details. Although I hate the act of picking out irrelevant faults to show my tactile sensitivity, but there are many flaws, and it does affect the look and feel.
After thinking about it, I named the thing that scares me in the movie, State Terrorism. But this word seems to have been used by many people, 囧.
Just imagine, if in this film, it is not Oriya of the Ministry of Defense who controls everything, but someone who is a careerist. Although he can't reach the heights of 1984, Brave New World, etc., it is enough to make people shudder.
Or with the advancement of technology, autocracy will become easier, and control will become more and more strict... Literary prison, now there are 50 cents, netscape, national security, and rulers seem to have always been at the forefront of the times in controlling thought and suppressing speech.
This topic ends here.
Another bright spot appeared in the FBI, whom I had always regarded as a villain. Handed the dog tag and gun to LaBeouf, got back into the car, perished with the plane controlled by Oria, and the like, and finally LaBeouf shot the sky in the concert hall to stop the performance, and was shot by many guards middle. In line with the previous majestic American national anthem, it does have a touch of sensationalism.
As far as I know, in American movies, aside from documentaries that reflect historical themes, such scenes of personal sacrifice by Huang Jiguang and Qiu Shaoyun are rarely seen.
At that time, I even made a vicious speculation, whether the economic crisis will force the American people to sacrifice themselves... The Ministry of Incineration is advocating the main theme? The American imperial people living in dire straits.
Contrary to what most people think, individual heroism is popular all over the world. Although everyone has different views on the sacrifices caused by this, heroes are always heroes, and those who elevate themselves by talking about heroes are not necessarily clowns, but they are not far behind. The more you respect life and cherish the country of life, the easier it is to produce such heroes who would rather sacrifice their own lives, and the greater the value of such heroes. On the contrary, there is a well-known saying: "A nation without great people is the most pitiful group of creatures in the world; a country with great people but not knowing to support, love, and admire is hopeless. The country of slaves."
Let's spoil it at the end, LaBeouf, the protagonist, didn't die in the end, and went to receive a medal. Also because of this, in my heart, his image is not as good as the dead FBI. Well, in fact, this film should be given to Samsung. Fuzzy characters, mediocre actions and gun battle scenes, dazzling but not brilliant special effects, no memorable lines...
View more about Eagle Eye reviews
