(Hereinafter, I just write indiscriminately. I didn’t think about it in many places, or there are contradictions, or sentiments, or nonsense, or pretending to be forced. Please forgive me.)
If you pick the science fiction elements of this movie, no matter how bad it is I am really sorry for the soft injuries, sci-fi fans. If you sum up all the jokes of this movie, it is actually nothing more than that for audiences who are familiar with comedy films.
The different effects of the trailer and the feature film caused a lot of psychological gaps in the audience, which made the film extremely bored. So it also caused another opposite psychological reaction of many viewers, and the unexpected is also a kind of surprise, so this film is extremely praised. I think the deviation between the trailer and the feature film is also part of the movie theme that the film's creators want to express, but it is not as smart as the movie, and it is a bit smart.
In fact, movies are not that bad, nor are they so good. Don't ignore that it is also a science fiction film just because it is a comedy, and don't think it shouldn't be made into a comedy just because it should be a science fiction movie.
If you ignore the technical details, from the point of view of special effects and sci-fi elements, this is a near future near-earth star wars sci-fi. From the beginning, advertising on the moon, Nazi bases, flying saucers, spaceships of various countries, earth-moon wars, and just a few shots at the end. It brought out the nuclear war and also hinted at the march to Mars. As for the "mutilation", in fact, most of the sci-fi misuses can be fooled technically. As long as the author has the heart, he can give a reasonable explanation. Since it's science fiction, you don't need to pay too much attention to these. So maybe it can be said that in terms of science fiction, the shortcomings of this movie are just not "serious" enough, maybe you can also imagine him as "serious".
(Some people say that the Chinese will not be able to make such an imaginative film in 100 years. Then many people said that they were too optimistic, and finally bidding for a million years like a bid. In fact, I think this film has not surpassed at all. The level of imagination of the Chinese people, because since you can say that, you understand it. If you don’t mean to raise yourself, then others must understand it as well as you. As far as humor is concerned, it's just silly. At least Guo Degang's level is not below this film. Besides, political elements are actually irrelevant. The film does not subvert Western values. Of course, China has no reason to allow you to subvert itself; It satirizes the various actions of Western developed countries. If you are interested, just subscribe to the People’s Daily or insist on watching the news broadcast every day. At the same time, they mocked some small arrogant countries and small conservative countries. But we didn't do it less in private.)
I think this is a common science fiction and comedy movie. If you must tell who is worse, I choose comedy effect. As for many people who regard it as a dark classic, I can’t agree. With this level of joke, any European and American talk show can talk about ten minutes a day without interruption, and the other shortcomings of the movie even scattered these. The comic effect failed to make these jokes reach the desired level. Many people compare it with "Silver Man" and "Doctor Strange Love". The three are quite different, but only in terms of humor, I only feel that the film is far from being superficial and has no technical content at all. , Especially political jokes that many people regard as bright spots. It’s not as dense as there is no machine gun-like pleasure, but there is never the accuracy of a sniper rifle. The gun pretends), and there is no such thing as an atomic bomb explosion. Moreover, the effect of talk shows on some comedy sections is achieved, but the movie does not say that crosstalk is not a variety show, but there must be performances. If the actors can be less blunt and pretentious in their performances, I want to be able to express themselves in comedy. More successful. There are also some jokes, aimed at specific groups of people, some are superficial but for the Chinese people are not pretending to be forced or unable to laugh at all.
As mentioned earlier, perhaps it can be said that in terms of science fiction, the shortcomings of this movie are just not "serious" enough. It’s just maybe, in fact, there are so many sci-fi movies that are less serious, and sci-fi fans rarely feel that they don’t admit that this is sci-fi. This is because the "non-serious" part of the movie has nothing to do with sci-fi, sci-fi elements and comedy. The elements do not combine naturally, but each speak independently, distracting the theme. Both the main plot and the visual effects of this movie are based on science fiction, and there are few plots that can be left alone for comedy to play. However, in pursuit of comedy effects, sometimes comedy elements jump out of the plot and break coherence. If the science fiction of this film is not worth mentioning, then he is also a mediocre good guy, and the comedy element is a big badass in the film. He is regarded as a highlight not because he is really bright, but because he is really bright. So I came to my conclusion.
What’s more successful is that this film caters to the pretender’s pretender psychology, allowing some people to show “I understand, I laughed, it’s too classic, what, you don’t know where it’s funny?” and “You guys These idiots don’t look good if you don’t understand them." Or "I knew it was a comedy for a long time" or "Your adaptability is too bad" or "It's so sad that you didn't even watch it." Understand"...I also listed the so-called grooves to show my literacy and appreciation ability. I believe you will burst into laughter as soon as you see that lens. I also believe that there will not be too many omissions in the list. It's seldom that it will be reflected after a long time in the past, and it will not even be discovered after a few years. You are really awesome.
It is worth mentioning that it is behind this movie. But when I saw someone in the short comment saying that "all roughness can be forgiven", I shouldn't mention this paragraph (waiting for you to forgive the national tragedy movie), others have made it very clear, and pay tribute to the director. Like a tribute to a movie fan who donated money (I want to know whether it is fundraising or donation).
View more about Iron Sky reviews
