First of all, why is this film more and more like a stupid ethics film, and it is still unreasonable ethics. It is better for a person like John to die early. I don't think he is reshaping society or purifying human nature. All these can only mean that he is a boring pervert.
If you're punishing criminals fleeing trial, it's okay to go overboard, but look at how many innocent people are on this film.
Leaving aside Amanda, this family matter, no matter what you do, you will use death to test people. Who is unforgivable, must die, and experience pain before dying, right? On the contrary, I think it's too easy for John to die like this. Why don't you try those torture tools yourself.
From Amanda's point of view, it wasn't her fault in the first place, and John had to train her to be a pervert. I don't think the scavenger that John thinks is very noble. In fact, it is still the same as what Amanda said. Don't think that anyone has changed, but no one has changed.
If it is said that Amanda designed the levels of these cheating people, it is also problematic, at least John knows and agrees, because every time he passes a level, he will report to John, and at most, the torture tools are heavy. The story wasn't planned by Boring John yet.
If it's called horror and thriller, it's all praise for him, but it's almost the same as a disgusting movie. What makes him different is that the most prominent disgust is not the picture, but the theme-oriented disgust. Maybe I'm used to seeing bad guys who punish evil and promote good things and bad guys who are bad to the end. It's really rare to see such calm and self-righteous perverts like this theme's advocacy of the mentally retarded.
In other words, it's too much. There are a lot of disgusting movies in the American version. The disgusting feature film is "Chainsaw 3". It's not that I have high morals, it's just that John's immortality is too annoying to look at.
View more about Saw III reviews
