I think there is only one normal person in the whole film, Kelly,
The others are more or less villains
Matthew, violent law enforcement, personal problems lead to family disagreements
Amanda, design a dead end, have to treat people to death as their own experiments
Judge, arbitrarily sentenced, unfair justice
Black driver, run over another kid
Female eyewitness, failure to attend leads to miscarriage of justice
Doctor, cheating, half-hearted in rescuing his child, abandoning the male protagonist
The male protagonist can't let go of his hatred, so much so that he forgets that his daughter is easy to support
The last one, and the biggest bad guy
JAW John. Our old jigsaw John
Why do you say this? He judges others from his own moral high ground. Of course, this is the tradition of this movie series, and it is understandable as a horror movie. After all, the old man is known as a villain.
However, he took the lives of Jeff and others as a test for Amanda? ? ? ?
I can't understand, since it is designed to test others and leave others a way of life so that others can achieve the goal of redemption, since the old man has such a genius, why not design two paths separately, one for Amanda's test, and one for Amanda's test. What about Jeff et al?
The reversal of the plot is not a problem at all, it's just a matter of adjusting the timeline. The second part used lying skills to deceive Officer Matthew, and this one can also use lying skills to deceive Amanda. Why waste so much waiting Trial and redemption of human life?
Secondly, the doctor saved people, saved the old man, and the movie wrote her to death.
The doctor was killed by a mechanism designed by Amanda and the old man.
The organ was started by Jeff. But there is a causal relationship here. Because the old man provoked Jeff to kill him, Jeff killed the old man and the doctor's head was blown to pieces (it's so pitiful, it's not his fault that he saved someone else's head and blew his own).
In fact, in Jeff's situation, if it were you, you would kill the old man.
What has Jeff been through? He experienced the death of his own son, followed by the deaths of people who had chosen to forgive his son, and the pain of being killed again. Think about it, your son was crushed to death, you suffered for several years, and then the enemies were waiting for you to be slaughtered in front of you. . .
So this is a total fake test. Plot bug, forcibly kill the doctor and play Jeff.
Some people say that there is no need to talk about ethics in this movie, but why do I feel at the end that what the director wants to express is ethics? Otherwise, there is not much difference between Chainsaw Cry and ordinary plasma tablets.
Society requires our morality to be higher than the morality of criminal law. But you can see a lot of people in the movie die because they didn't follow the morals of society. For example, the doctor's infidelity contributed to the death of his son, Jeff's depravity, and the unknown operation of the judge (simplification of private law issues). . . These may be difficult to find illegal places in the law, but the jigsaw represents the justice to judge them (you can also say guide "redemption").
In this way, in fact, what the old jigsaw wants to play is a full-time police officer and a moral teacher. If you make a mistake, you are likely to be killed by him. ?
That's why I thought that what the movie wants to tell us is to be a good citizen, don't harm yourself if you don't have anything. Less crime, less civil law?? Do not cheat.
Horror movies are what irritates you. The above are just my personal thoughts. The method of killing is only to fiddle with the audience's feelings, so it is understandable that there are some bugs in the plot.
The horror movies made by Wen Ziren are very good. Compared with many of their peers, I don't know how much better. I am very happy to have a Chinese horror movie master to bring us interesting works.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, thank you
View more about Saw III reviews
