The first part of the textbook can be used as a textbook for film standardization, and it can also reflect what kind of reality the screenwriter is.
It's really hard to figure out the structure of this movie. It's not as simple as wrapping a story over a story. It's a world where all imaginations are irresponsibly circled. I even thought this was a story with an open ending, because It is really hard to imagine the logic of its development to this point.
But this is a story that combines creativity and reality. The dialogue part is the highlight of the film, and it is also an extremely important part as a screenwriter in reality. The dialogue is used to describe the characters' characters, and the dialogue is influenced by psychology. But I also feel that the story has a story, the characters have characters, the background is not bad, and the dialogue is very strong, but it leads to such a confusing movie with uneasy specifications.
It is not easy to make a real adaptation as dramatic as a movie without falling into the cliché, just like adapting an expository book into a flesh-and-blood movie that can be enjoyed by the public without taking the old route. Where is the story. Perhaps the last absurdity, the viewer has been reminded, is the same as what the teacher warned Nicolas Cage, and it is surprising at the end. double meaning. Another innocuous joke with everyone, including the movie
View more about Adaptation. reviews
