1. Do you think that the director did not add any narration to mean that he did not speak! Organize into plots with his selected fragments, this is the expression.
2. Senna and Proust said at the same time that it was just that the former left a great deal and the latter retired quietly. Do you think this should be the difference between evaluating them!
3. The term "politics" is not used as derogatory as the Chinese in Europe.
4. Brazil’s cult of Senna’s heroism has added complex meaning to his identity. For that country, Senna still belongs to a small number of rich people.
5. The last line is really superfluous! At least it will be ambiguous. The FIA did not increase protection measures because of the loss of Senna, but because it lost too many drivers, including Rozenberg, who had left Senna a few days earlier.
I didn't see the era of Senna, but witnessed the era of Schumacher. Why are there so many people mentioning the car king in the short comment, and how can it be seen from a documentary that the car king is inferior to the car god? What if there is another Schumacher documentary?
F1 was a game of interest in the early days. Sportsmanship and civilian legends are actually not suitable for this circle. From this perspective, Senna is more like a rebel, but after all, he has never jumped out of this circle.
The documentary seems to be an objective withdrawal, but in fact it still implies the creator's cult of personality and allusions. It must be wrong to think that this is true!
View more about Senna reviews
