. I was always worried about him and guessed how the director arranged it, but at the end it was the battery alarm that caught the robber's attention and saw the girl on the opposite side. . . Quietly shut him down. . . . . . . God, they are robbers who kill without blinking an eye. . . .
2. The head of the robber is from Wall Street and is obviously a man with high IQ. He planned and arranged this hijacking to increase his earnings from stocks. He actually took the money bag and took it away without checking it carefully. Positioning means. . . . As a result, the other two died as soon as they hit the ground. . . . It doesn't match his high IQ. . . . Hey
3. The ending is too anticlimactic. After Washington catches up, I think it should have an unexpected ending. As a result, Lao Hua was shot and killed. The film has developed to this point, and there is a lot of room for development. Comrade director actually It's straight up, I'm so disappointed. It is estimated that the director suddenly found out that the film was timed out while filming, so he just got stuck, hey. . .
4. In addition, the robber's head is estimated to have earned no less than 200 million in stocks. I didn't see it clearly. Is it necessary to drag the 3 million purse back and forth? At first I thought he would give some bribes. Washington, Lao Hua has a criminal record. . . . . .
Finally, we don’t understand religion either. We don’t know much about the crimes and redemption of Lao Hua and the robber head mentioned in the film (the so-called depth of this film?), welcome to make a brick.
View more about The Taking of Pelham 123 reviews
