The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Alisa 2021-10-22 14:41:29

Barely two points. After eleven years, the second brush, I still went to sleep. This film, like the original, is a British souvenir creation. Only the British have this kind of cute and cute idea of ​​their own. The starring Freeman is also the representative face of this kind of film, but this kind of broken mouth, panic, The image of the face of a British farmer, most people just think that their self-feeling good is a mental disability. The earth was demolished at the beginning, and another was created at the end of the film. In the middle are some messy farce content that is not inherited from one to the other. There is also a quotation of a theory and then a nonsense operation. These brain holes are just random associations and do not constitute the aforementioned theories. It’s not difficult or fun to subvert. The interesting point is that the dejection robot Marvin and the like are finally rounded up in the end. In fact, the cross talk does the same thing, but this can't offset the crudeness of the stubborn passages in the middle. After so many specious explorations of the ultimate meaning, the plot finally fell on carnal pleasure (the male protagonist’s confession of love). This spiritual realm is much lower than Liu Cixin and the male protagonist is so ugly. The CG of the whole film is done well, and you can see the sincerity

Felipe 2021-10-22 14:41:29

The part of creating the earth is very imaginative, but the plot is fragmented and illogical. Just an introduction to settings? . . . (Expansion, there are comments that it is mainly a variety of metaphors?). . . Also, many people like that melancholy robot, Marvin~