1. Why did Ryder choose a hip model from Lithuania to Iceland? This question is very strange, because of three key words: Lithuania, buttocks, Iceland. Anyone with a little EQ knows that I'm staring at this hip. This question is already answered in the movie. Because Ryder was a Wall Street employee at the time. But this is obviously not enough. For the Chinese, it will never be known whether Wall Street workers like Lithuania, buttocks or Iceland. In fact, maybe people in the movie don't know that the director used Chinese culture to hide a message from everyone: he wants a son to inherit his legacy. Because the butt can give birth to a son.
2. Why the bag dropped in the tunnel must be the bag with the gun? Why should this question be raised by a primary school student, and why would I raise it? Because if it weren't for that, Gerber wouldn't have shot Ryder in the end. If I were the director, I would arrange for two purses, one of which had a gun. A movie is not a movie without coincidences. Although the movie is not as real as life, after all, it comes from life and life is also composed of countless coincidences. Some people say that Hollywood movies are too far from life, with stereotypical plots and a single model. But what I like is the shooting skills of Hollywood movies, the grasp of the psychology of the characters, and the exciting pictures that some movies should have by nature. China is a country with 5,000 years of culture, so the films made by Chinese filmmakers seem to be so cultural and meaningful. They may have found a shortcut to make good movies - they are so mysterious that you can't understand them. For example, "Breathe", a movie that even the main character (Ge You) can't read the script, let us viewers think about it; for example, "Women Are Not Bad", Tsui Hark's martial arts films are tired of filming and play love, it is estimated that I know I'm not good, so I try to pretend as much as possible; as for "Perfect", I haven't finished watching it, maybe I can understand the plot, but I definitely can't understand the central idea of the director's answer. I think, a good movie must be made to appeal to the audience, just like a ball game must be made to appeal to the audience. After all, we have to pay to watch a movie. I have absolutely no problem if you put it on youku after filming, and you can spend a little money online. That's why I'm writing a review for Cry Movie, because I understand it.
3. Finally, I want to ask a very professional question: Why is the success rate of the municipal government's counter-case so high? In fact, this question does not need an answer for the film Bunsen, but this is a foreshadowing carefully arranged by the director for the shooting of the sequel. I'm not pretending to be mystical, let me tell you why. I think the director must have a good understanding of the law, because I only learned the law after studying the law. I don’t think ordinary people can see it. What I want to say is that Gerber is not guilty at all. How can we overturn the argument that our lovely mayor of New York has fooled Gerber enough. Why? Didn't he plead guilty to taking bribes? In fact, his charges are not convicted. I will analyze his charges from two aspects: theory and litigation. First of all, we know that Gerber chose Japanese goods when choosing the train. Everyone knows that Japan's Shinkansen trains are famous all over the world. As for Canada, it is estimated that it does not produce trains. It was used by the director to make fun of it. How to say Gerber chose the better quality Japanese trains. This greatly reduces the social harm of Gerber's behavior. The so-called social harm means whether your actions harm the interests of others. If Gerber chooses a lower-quality train for money, he will undoubtedly endanger many people's right to life and health. Then again, if everyone were like Gerber, it would also bring chaos to society. But combined with Gerber's subjective view that this amount of money was used to help his children's tuition fees, I felt that Gerber's social harm was very low, and he would not be punished by criminal punishment. Furthermore, in terms of litigation, there is no evidence to convict Gerber of the crime. Some people will ask him if he did not admit it? In fact, for all crimes, only the defendant's oral statement, without other evidence, is impossible to convict. . Besides, it was a Japanese company who paid bribes to Gerber. Given the transnational nature of the case and the issue of judicial costs, I think it is unlikely to obtain substantial evidence. Based on the above analysis, Gerber will soon know that the mayor has deceived him, and then thinking of what Gerber said and what Ryder did on the Ryder team, he felt that it was necessary to take revenge on the society
... The three questions I have asked have already been completed, and I have not tried to answer them. In addition, I also give you a question: why does this movie have no R-rated content? Everyone needs to answer this question.
View more about The Taking of Pelham 123 reviews
