This film should belong to the masterpiece of Hollywood's rising color widescreen. The colors and shooting techniques are very good, and everyone is probably talking about it as the oversized American flag at the beginning. That set of lenses is indeed very good, not much to say. My main reason is that I have the potential to stab me recently, so I started to stab me when I saw it halfway through last night. I used Google and Baidu to verify it. I'm here today to make a mark.
This film is well-made. I saw half of it that I thought it was incredible. The tank in the film is much better than the tank of World War II. The size and barrel are very different from the level of World War II. At first I thought that German tanks were hard to get (after all, most of the No. 4 tanks, Panther tanks, and Tiger tanks were scrapped at the time. Just a few of them were also eaten up in the museum. So I guessed that the German tanks have It may be modified from the Soviet T34, and the American tank may be a late Sherman). Check it on the Internet. Although the T34 has a large output that year and has many modifications, it is not the same as in the movie when you look at the chassis. Even with the modification, the tanks in the movie were also changed too neatly. The American tank is even less likely to be Sherman, because Sherman's characteristics are obvious: the tank has a high net height, the chassis looks like a bread, and the turret's inclined armor is also very rough.
Go to check the German World War II tank series. In fact, German tanks are still very easy to recognize. Except for the Panther tank, there is basically no inclined armor design. Tank turrets like to use riveting, basically no casting (the one that was better made at the time was only T34). And the track is obviously different from the Soviet tank, which is much more complicated. All kinds of tanks are square-headed and square-headed. At first glance, I think the Tiger tank is a bit similar to the m1a1 tank... At that time, the tanks in the North African battlefield were mainly the No. 4 tank and the Leopard. Unfortunately, the tanks in the movie were not like both.
I didn’t have a clue, I just checked the movie. I was planning to check if there are any military fans from all walks of life to make a thorough analysis of the show. After all, there are many diehard fans in this film-such as the teacher Yingda in "Party A and Party B", who doesn’t move at all. Give someone a piece of cattle Jessie’s farm. This kind of thing is naturally thoroughly studied by them over and over again.
It turned out that the Germans in the film used the M48 tanks that were mainly installed by the Americans. Ironically, this tank is also called the "Barton Tank." It looks like it should be improved from the M26 Pershing tank-the two chassis are very similar. Then it becomes clear that the Americans used the M47 tanks in the film, which should be the main battle tanks that the U.S. military was going to eliminate that year. Although it is a biographical film, it is estimated that the US military has not invested less resources, and the sentiment is also filmed by the troops drawn out with real guns and live ammunition. It turns out that making war films is not just our Bayi Factory desperately using real troops to make big scenes.
One last detail is the banner of the opening movie. I don’t know if anyone paid attention, that flag is different from the current American flag. There are only 48 stars, not the current 50. Because Alaska and Hawaii were not yet American states at the time, these two places would not be considered American states until 1959 and 1960. I checked the life of Button. This old man continued his battlefield reincarnation in 1945. In this life, he has not caught the 50-star United States of America flag. So the banner in the title is six columns with eight in each row, for a total of 48. Such small details can easily be let go if you don't pay attention. It can be seen that the production of this film is quite excellent.
View more about Patton reviews
