(the so-called eighth art is television, but how different is the difference between the two arts? )
As a latecomer, video games can draw lessons from film and television expressions.
But when video games are the expression form and feed back film and television, everyone (especially those who don’t play games) will feel amazing
. The director once said, "Lola Run" It is a brand new movie, this "new" should refer to the form of expression of the film,
but in fact, this brand new form, in another art form - video games, can only be said to belong to The “oldest” and most “basic” settings
Any game can be restarted cyclically after the Game Over, and come back from a certain save point, so
that multiple different endings coexist in the S/L Dafa RPG, AVG and other game types. , people who trigger different conditions in the middle of the game and lead to different
games have long been accustomed to the above settings, and they are used
to the success of "Lola Run". People who don't understand video games are amazing
(for around 2000, video games should still be relatively niche entertainment, and it is probably called art that will be ridiculed and questioned by most people),
but after all, the current form of TV is still unilateral. The success of "Lola Run" is more difficult to replicate.
Imagine that if the form of film and television evolves in the future, for example, multiple endings will become standard, and the plot can be changed according to the choice of the audience.
Another example is that some reality TV shows have already According to the audience's vote, some players can be "revived" and the defeated team can be resurrected.
These can actually be regarded as a successful counterattack in the art form of video games
. Some of the content can no longer be established, right?
In terms of plot, it is mentioned in the book that Lola moved a lot of people for running for love. Sorry, I don't include me
because I spent most of my time on three loops. The background plot is a bit weak
. A banker's "princess", Why would you give up on a gangster named gangster? Well, there are some loves in this world that have no reason,
but in order to save the "bastard", the "princess" can help her boyfriend rob the supermarket, hijack the father to rob the bank, and try her best in the casino... Before that, You can also help your boyfriend to deal with drugs and hand over
all kinds of things, packaged under "love", is it worthy of forgiveness, sympathy, or even approval?
I'm sorry again, I can't agree with
the ending of this film. The bastard got back the drug money, and Lola made a lot of windfall, so after this big reunion, can the two live a happy life?
It is a dark psychological conclusion that if there is a follow-up ending, then the final outcome of these two people should be death by drug addiction or death in a gang fight... The
details
of the number of 100,000 marks were not a sum of money for the Germans at that time. huge sum of money?
Let's say it's a huge sum of money, this is just a transaction payment for a drug deal, the gang leader wants to use this money to test Lola's boyfriend (failure in the test means losing the money); a day's turnover of a seemingly ordinary supermarket will be There were 200,000 marks; it seemed to be easily exchanged for Lola in the casino.
It's not a huge sum of money. The boy who sells the bicycle to Lola in the film asks for only 50 marks;
View more about Run Lola Run reviews
