Where does the most influential source of this phrase come from? It is the key to understanding its meaning.
This phrase comes from the most fascinating Supreme Court in the political operation of the United States. A famous judgment in 1919 is famous
because it is against the First Amendment and its influence continues to this day.
The Supreme Court does two things: it makes a judgment related to the First Amendment and a judgment that has nothing to do with the First Amendment. The
famous ruling in 19 years is to the effect:
unless it reaches the level of Clear and Present Danger, it cannot be advanced. In
the standard
film that prevents a certain statement from being published, that is, "pre-fixed" , this phrase comes from the president, saying that the drug problem is already Clear and Present Danger. . . . .
Speaking of this, the national security adviser on the opposite side is really thoughtful. Note that this thoughtful lens is quite in place. The
national security adviser has already understood the attitude of the boss: we have to "fix it in advance", and it is painful to you. up
but this did not matter to the Clear and Present Danger? But it’s not that they have the final say. It is the judgment of the judicial branch.
Therefore, even if this matter is done wisely, no matter how happy it is, the bosses are worried: this matter is illegal if it is uncertain.
Therefore, bosses especially The deputy director with glasses all left behind: If you don't sign, I won't do it!
Of course,
when Comrade Jack Ryan, who had been under the blanket all the time, was not in this list to face congressional inquiries, Comrade Ryan, who was still in the dark, even assured the Congress Committee: This time there will be absolutely no military action involved
. After that, the kind of anger towards my colleagues
Therefore, many people simply don't understand why Ryan has such a big hatred of his colleagues in the opposite office? What's more, colleagues are doing anti-bitch, bastard, and fighting harm for the country!
---------------------
This point of contradiction, combined with the title of the film and the title, is the point of conflict that the film and the original are emphatically expressed.
Around this point of conflict, that is The content of the administrative, judicial, and legislative forces is the most impressive driving force for the so-called political thrillers.
Of course, if it can be paired with the bombing scene with the drug lord, the sniper scene of the Cuban intelligence agent and the Latin lover killer, It's even more perfect.
What's more, these clues that can be brilliant in any aspect are actually combined by the director, no, by Tom Clancy.
What's more, there is also the hard work of Harrison Ford during the golden period
. . . . . .
Can you find a better film of the same kind?
View more about Clear and Present Danger reviews
