Watching a movie every week requires more perseverance than reading a book. This time, I saw "The Flaw". The plot story is strong, and the beautiful wife has an affair. This is a shame for Kochi's husband, so the husband Change began to plan a seemingly seamless love murder that killed his wife and forced a third party to die.
How to think about labeling. Let's talk about the star of this movie first, Anthony Hopkins. I am familiar with this actor from "Doctor Hannibal" and "Silence of the Lambs". He is highly intelligent, meticulous, calm but frightening. So does Ted. At the beginning of the movie, the characters are first explained, which greatly enhances the sense of substitution and logic of the plot. Ted is a senior engineer hired by International Airlines, his keen insight is better than all kinds of high-end instruments; Ted drives a high-end supercar, he is old but still passionate, so his wife's derailment is an intolerable shame for him; Ted walked into the hotel of his wife and the third party and witnessed their adultery. He walked out calmly without panic. This scene did not explain what Ted did in the hotel, which laid the groundwork for the plot. ; After his wife came home, Ted shot cleanly, with dim light handling, after the killing Ted packed up the bullet casings and burned the clothes he was wearing, a series of close-ups, showing Ted's still calm eyes, a The criminal with high IQ appeared in front of my eyes again.
Labeling such an Oscar-winning actor as Anthony Hopkins is indeed a good thing. The image of a high-IQ criminal is shaped to the extreme, and the audience will shudder when they see his image. This is undoubtedly a success. To give a counter example, Leonardo DiCaprio, when he was young, he was a passionate and pure Romeo, and after he became fat, he became the wolf of Wall Street full of money and eroticism. The label of his girl idol has been torn down, The image after that was shocking, maybe this is the reason for the twists and turns of Xiao Lizi's Oscar road. Whether labeling is good or bad will not be discussed, but labeling is memorable and impressive, and it is better to have labels than to live in the majority.
How to view winning and losing. It was mentioned earlier that there was no foreshadowing for Ted to go to the hotel. It was to change the gun, the gun of his wife's lover, and his wife's lover happened to be the policeman who caught Ted. These were all designed by Ted. This involves the principle of the "fruit of the poisonous tree". Specifically, the movie means that if the judge knows that the deceased and the police are lovers, then his evidence and testimony will be the fruit of the poisonous tree, which is not probative. So it doesn't matter if you change the gun or not. The clever thing is that the lawyer who sued Ted happened to be an arrogant person. He even wore a bow tie for the first time in court, contempt of court, and contempt for the case. An arrogant and illogical lawyer met a criminal with a high IQ and a thoughtful mind. Therefore, in the second trial, Ted publicly exposed the lawyer's witness to the truth that the police had an affair with his wife, causing the police to commit suicide. In the third trial, Ted applied for acquittal on the grounds that the lawyer could not find any evidence. The lawyer was arrested in the first round. ko. In between, he bumped into the leader, ignored his concern for his colleagues, ignored the company's new leader and had sex with her. What's even more outrageous is that he put on his pants and didn't recognize anyone, leaving the case that had already been settled. Cut to his own account, this kind of stance, he wanted to win too much, and finally Ted told him in a dim room that the lawyer "won".
But did lawyers really win? Ted has become famous at an age, and a beautiful car. For him, there is nothing he can't let go of. As for the lawyer, he has not achieved any achievements. The duel of this life-threatening duel is only this. The victory of a case, but he will not be the winner in life, the lawyer lost. People always live in contradictions, and the result is nothing more than winning or losing between sensibility and rationality.
This is a perfect "Flaw", killing his cheating wife, forcing a third party to death, and ruining a lawyer's future. It's hard to say whether Ted's final reconciliation was intentional or unintentional, just like Ted's marbles Like the spiral track, everything is in his design, but it is difficult to ensure that the wire will not bend and cause the marble to fall. A good movie is so unpredictable and unpredictable.
View more about Fracture reviews
