The first part is a fairy tale world that is relatively easy to enter, and the righteousness and evil that the characters want to express are also easy to grasp. Edmund's betrayal caused by gluttony seems logical. The children gradually become strong from cowardice, and everything is beautiful in the end. And simple fairy tales.
The emergence of "The Chronicles of Narnia 2: Prince Caspian" completely broke the pure mirror of fairy tales. The plot began to be twisted and complicated, the characters' personalities became more distinct, and the picture became closer to the effect of a technology blockbuster. The shocking symphony Background music, vast war scenes, dazzling 3D mirror images, the director made good use of computer technology, and the magic kingdom he created is far more powerful than the Lion King Aslan can create.
I read many reviews about it before going to the cinema. Audiences who are over-expected are often more likely to come out disappointed. They will mercilessly criticize the obscurity and darkness of part of the film, criticize the procrastination and unclear explanation of some plots, criticize the predictable and unsuspenseful development of the story, and of course. There are ugly faces of the "supporting characters". If this play is classified as a fairy tale for children, it can be said to be a crime.
If we look at this drama in a different mood, we will actually find that it is indeed much better than the first in some aspects. The story has already involved conspiracies in the struggle for power, the general's ignorance and awakening, the conflict between the two young Narnian leaders in their decision-making, and even a little budding love incidentally, although that makes it difficult. I find it a little strangely abrupt. The duel of war is almost close to the level of "The Lord of the Rings", and the imagination of the characters of the creatures is also close to PERFECT. Closing the movie with the call by reqina spektor is a beautiful ending.
Still a very good movie. It's just that Prince Caspian has never been conscious of being the protagonist. I feel that the personality that the movie has created for him is not as clear as that of the knight mouse. For me, he is more like a clue to the story, indispensable but not enough to lead. top card. In addition, the biggest regret after the end of the movie is that I can't understand Aslan as the patron saint. In addition to saying that the same thing will not happen a second time, in the 1300 years when the group of 4 was not summoned , what has it done for its afflicted people! ? Also, what was Peter shaken by the White Witch. Can anyone tell me. Bewildered, bewildered.
Finally, pay tribute to the tauren who used his body to lift the escape gate, and pay tribute to the hero centaur who was blocked by the door and faced death in the city but resolutely nodded to the leader. The object is very much the jazz cat of "Shrek". The happy tribute brought by the knight mouse, and the loyal tribute to the "little boy" from beginning to end!
PS: Among the 4 people, it seems that only Edmond looks better than before. Pretty boy~~HOHO~~
PS2: According to the last lines of the movie, Narnia 3 is not impossible, the protagonists will be Edmund and Lucy~
View more about The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian reviews
